AI bot to detect fake COVID-19 vaccine certificate

被引:3
作者
Arif, Muhammad [1 ]
Shamsudheen, Shermin [2 ]
Ajesh, F. [3 ]
Wang, Guojun [1 ]
Chen, Jianer [1 ]
机构
[1] Guangzhou Univ, Sch Comp Sci, Guangzhou 510006, Peoples R China
[2] Jazan Univ, Fac Comp Sci & Informat Technol, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
[3] Sree Buddha Coll Engn, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Alappuzha, India
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
artificial intelligence; COVID-19; deep learning; forged certificate; vaccine certificate; IMAGE; COLOR;
D O I
10.1049/ise2.12063
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
As the world is now fighting against rampant virus COVID-19, the development of vaccines on a large scale and making it reach millions of people to be immunised has become quintessential. So far 40.9% of the world got vaccinated. Still, there are more to get vaccinated. Those who got vaccinated have the chance of getting the vaccine certificate as proof to move, work, etc., based on their daily requirements. But others create their own forged vaccine certificate using advanced software and digital tools which will create complex problems where we cannot distinguish between real and fake vaccine certificates. Also, it will create immense pressure on the government and as well as healthcare workers as they have been trying to save people from day 1, but parallelly people who have fake vaccine certificates roam around even if they are COVID/Non-COVID patients. So, to avoid this huge problem, this paper focuses on detecting fake vaccine certificates using a bot powered by Artificial Intelligence and neurologically powered by Deep Learning in which the following are the stages: a) Data Collection, b) Preprocessing to remove noise from the data, and convert to grayscale and normalised, c) Error level analysis, d) Texture-based feature extraction for extracting logo, symbol and for the signature we extract Crest-Trough parameter, and e) Classification using DenseNet201 and thereby giving the results as fake/real certificate. The evaluation of the model is taken over performance measures like accuracy, specificity, sensitivity, detection rate, recall, f1-score, and computation time over state-of-art models such as SVM, RNN, VGG16, Alexnet, and CNN in which the proposed model (D201-LBP) outperforms with an accuracy of 0.94.
引用
收藏
页码:362 / 372
页数:11
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Abdullah-All-Tanvir Mahir E.M., 2019, 2019 7 INT C SMART C, P1
  • [2] Forgery Detection Based on Intrinsic Document Contents
    Ahmed, Amr
    Shafait, Faisal
    [J]. 2014 11TH IAPR INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON DOCUMENT ANALYSIS SYSTEMS (DAS 2014), 2014, : 252 - 256
  • [3] Al W., 2020, SOFT COMPUT, V1, P16
  • [4] Comparison of deep learning approaches to predict COVID-19 infection
    Alakus, Talha Burak
    Turkoglu, Ibrahim
    [J]. CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2020, 140
  • [5] Alazab Moutaz, 2020, International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, P168
  • [6] COVID-19 Public Sentiment Insights: A Text Mining Approach to the Gulf Countries
    Albahli, Approach Saleh
    Algsham, Ahmad
    Aeraj, Shamsulhaq
    Alsaeed, Muath
    Alrashed, Muath
    Rauf, Hafiz Tayyab
    Arif, Muhammad
    Mohammed, Mazin Abed
    [J]. CMC-COMPUTERS MATERIALS & CONTINUA, 2021, 67 (02): : 1613 - 1627
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2017, Electron. Imaging, DOI DOI 10.2352/ISSN.2470-1173.2017.7.MWSF-328
  • [8] [Anonymous], 2016, IEEE INT WORKSHOP, DOI DOI 10.1109/WIFS.2016.78239
  • [9] Prediction and analysis of COVID-19 positive cases using deep learning models: A descriptive case study of India
    Arora, Parul
    Kumar, Himanshu
    Panigrahi, Bijaya Ketan
    [J]. CHAOS SOLITONS & FRACTALS, 2020, 139
  • [10] Bayar B., 2016, P 4 ACM WORKSH INF H, P5