Multisite fMRI reproducibility of a motor task using identical MR systems

被引:44
作者
Costafreda, Sergi G.
Brammer, Michael J.
Vencio, Ricardo Z. N.
Mourao, Maria L.
Portela, Luiz A. P.
de Castro, Claudio Campi
Giampietro, Vincent P.
Amaro, Edson, Jr.
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat, Brain Image Anal Unit, London SE5 8AF, England
[2] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Cerebro, Hosp Israelita Albert Einstein, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[3] Univ Sao Paulo, Inst Matemat & Estadist, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[4] Hosp Beneficiencia Portuguesa, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[5] Hosp Coracao, Sao Paulo, Brazil
[6] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Inst Coracao InCor, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
[7] Univ Sao Paulo, Fac Med, Inst Radiol InRad, BR-05508 Sao Paulo, Brazil
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
fMRI; multisite studies; reproducibility of results; variance components analysis; motor task;
D O I
10.1002/jmri.21118
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose: To estimate between-scanner functional MRI (fMRI) reproducibility in a multisite study. Materials and Methods: A total of five identical 1.5T MR systems were used to repeatedly scan five subjects while performing a finger tapping task. A two-way (scanners, subjects) random effects analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to estimate between-scanner and between-subject variability on two outcome variables: task-related mean blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) signal change and volume of activation within a motor region-of-interest (ROI). Results: Between-scanner variability of fMRI data accounted for a small proportion of the total variation in the BOLD signal change (8.34%, P = 0.114) and volume of activation (5.46%, P = 0.203). Between-subject variation accounted for more than half of the total variation for both measurements (57.17% and 54.46%, respectively, P < 0.01). Conclusion: These results support the feasibility of multisite studies using identical scanner systems.
引用
收藏
页码:1122 / 1126
页数:5
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   Generic brain activation mapping in functional magnetic resonance imaging: A nonparametric approach [J].
Brammer, MJ ;
Bullmore, ET ;
Simmons, A ;
Williams, SCR ;
Grasby, PM ;
Howard, RJ ;
Woodruff, PWR ;
RabeHesketh, S .
MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING, 1997, 15 (07) :763-770
[2]  
Brown C., 1991, FUNDAMENTALS EXPLORA, P193
[3]   Wavelets and functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human brain [J].
Bullmore, ET ;
Fadili, J ;
Maxim, V ;
Sendur, L ;
Whitcher, B ;
Suckling, J ;
Brammer, M ;
Breakspear, M .
NEUROIMAGE, 2004, 23 :S234-S249
[4]  
Bullmore ET, 1999, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V7, P38, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0193(1999)7:1<38::AID-HBM4>3.3.CO
[5]  
2-H
[6]   Global, voxel, and cluster tests, by theory and permutation, for a difference between two groups of structural MR images of the brain [J].
Bullmore, ET ;
Suckling, J ;
Overmeyer, S ;
Rabe-Hesketh, S ;
Taylor, E ;
Brammer, MJ .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 1999, 18 (01) :32-42
[7]  
Bullmore ET, 2001, HUM BRAIN MAPP, V12, P61, DOI 10.1002/1097-0193(200102)12:2<61::AID-HBM1004>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-W
[9]   A review of methods for measurement systems capability analysis [J].
Burdick, RK ;
Borror, CM ;
Montgomery, DC .
JOURNAL OF QUALITY TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 35 (04) :342-354
[10]   Reproducibility of fMRI results across four institutions using a spatial working memory task [J].
Casey, BJ ;
Cohen, JD ;
O'Craven, K ;
Davidson, RJ ;
Irwin, W ;
Nelson, CA ;
Noll, DC ;
Hu, XP ;
Lowe, MJ ;
Rosen, BR ;
Truwitt, CL ;
Turski, P .
NEUROIMAGE, 1998, 8 (03) :249-261