Copy theory

被引:10
作者
de Fremery, Wayne [1 ]
Buckland, Michael K. [2 ]
机构
[1] Sogang Univ, Sch Media Arts & Sci, 35 Baekbeom Ro, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Univ Calif Berkeley, Sch Informat, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1002/asi.24558
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In information science, writing, printing, telecommunication, and digital computing have been central concerns because of their ability to distribute information. Overlooked is the obvious fact that these technologies fashion copies, and the theorizing of copies has been neglected. We may think a copy is the same as what it copies, but no two objects can really be the same. "The same" means similar enough as an acceptable substitute for some purpose. The differences between usefully similar things are also often important, in forensic analysis, for example, or inferential processes. Status as a copy is only one form of relationship between objects, but copies are so integral to information science that they demand a theory. Indeed, theorizing copies provides a basis for a more complete and unified view of information science.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 418
页数:12
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]  
Agarwal N K., 2018, Exploring Context in Information Behaviour: Seeker, Situation, Surroundings, and Shared Identities, DOI DOI 10.2200/S00807ED1V01Y201710ICR061
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, The Intellectual Foundation of Information Organization
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, FUNCT REQ BIBL REC F
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1979, GENESIS DEV SCI FACT
[5]  
Association for Information Science and Technology, 2020, WHAT IS INF SCI
[6]  
Badia A., 2019, INFORM MANIFOLD
[7]  
Beck A., 2016, IMITAT ZITAT PLAGIAT
[8]  
Bendikson L, 1932, LIBR J, V57, P789
[9]  
Benjamin W., 1936, WORK ART AGE MECH RE
[10]  
Boon Marcus., 2010, In Praise of Copying