Equivalence of hydroxyethyl starch HES 130/0.4 and HES 200/0.5 for perioperative volume replacement in major gynaecological surgery

被引:38
作者
Sander, O
Reinhart, K
Meier-Hellman, A
机构
[1] Helios Clin Erfurt GmbH, Dept Anaesthesiol Pain Therapy Intens Care Med, D-99089 Erfurt, Germany
[2] Univ Jena, Dept Anaesthesiol & Intens Care Med, D-6900 Jena, Germany
关键词
C2/C6; ratio; hydroxyethyl starch; molar substitution; perioperative haemodynamic stability;
D O I
10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00220.x
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Background: Hydroxyethyl starch solutions (HES) are increasingly used for the compensation of surgical blood loss. The objective of this clinical trial was to compare a novel 6% HES 130/0.4 solution with a favourable pharmacological profile and a standard 6% HES 200/0.5 solution for maintenance of haemodynamic stability in major gynaecological surgery. Methods: Sixty female patients aged 18 - 80 years undergoing major gynaecological surgery with indication for perioperative colloidal volume replacement were enrolled in this prospective, randomized double-blinded clinical study. The administration of study medication was dependent on individual requirements to maintain haemodynamic stability. The amount of study medication required from induction of anaesthesia until 6 h postoperatively served as the primary investigative parameter. Results: The two one-sided test procedure by Westlake demonstrated equivalence of mean infused volumes between HES 130/0.4 and HES 200/0.5 during the study period ( 1224 +/- 544 ml and 1389 +/- 610 ml, respectively, P< 0.05). Perioperatively, haemodynamics did not differ significantly between treatment groups. While none of the mean values of coagulation parameters shifted outside the normal range, the degree of haemodilution revealed reduced haematocrit values in HES 200/0.5 treated patients at 6 h postoperatively ( P< 0.05). Moreover, prothrombin time ( PT) was higher and consequently international normalized ratio (INR) was lower at the same time point for patients who received HES 130/0.4 ( P< 0.05). Conclusion: This clinical trial demonstrated therapeutic equivalence of this novel low-substituted HES 130/0.4 solution and a standard HES 200/0.5 solution for perioperative volume replacement. Moreover, both HES preparations were equally well-tolerated and safe.
引用
收藏
页码:1151 / 1158
页数:8
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Baron J., 2000, YB INTENSIVE CARE EM, P486
[2]   RETRACTED: Volume replacement strategies on intensive care units: results from a postal survey (Retracted Article) [J].
Boldt, J ;
Lenz, M ;
Kumle, B ;
Papsdorf, M .
INTENSIVE CARE MEDICINE, 1998, 24 (02) :147-151
[3]  
Boldt J, 1999, Minerva Anestesiol, V65, P305
[4]  
Boldt J, 2000, J CARDIOTHOR VASC AN, V14, P264
[5]  
BUNN F, 2001, COCHRANE DATABASE SY, P2
[6]   Crystalloids vs. colloids in fluid resuscitation: A systematic review [J].
Choi, PTL ;
Yip, G ;
Quinonez, LG ;
Cook, DJ .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 1999, 27 (01) :200-210
[7]   Coagulation effects of a recently developed hydroxyethyl starch (HES 130/0.4) compared to hydroxyethyl starches with higher molecular weight [J].
Entholzner, EK ;
Mielke, LL ;
Calatzis, AN ;
Feyh, J ;
Hipp, R ;
Hargasser, SR .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2000, 44 (09) :1116-1121
[8]   The effects of hydroxyethyl starches of varying molecular weights on platelet function [J].
Franz, A ;
Bräunlich, P ;
Gamsjäger, T ;
Felfernig, M ;
Gustorff, B ;
Kozek-Langenecker, SA .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 92 (06) :1402-1407
[9]   RETRACTED: Influence of a new hydroxyethylstarch preparation (HES 130/0.4) on coagulation in cardiac surgical patients (Retracted article. See vol. 25, pg. 755, 2011) [J].
Haisch, G ;
Boldt, J ;
Krebs, C ;
Suttner, S ;
Lehmann, A ;
Isgro, F .
JOURNAL OF CARDIOTHORACIC AND VASCULAR ANESTHESIA, 2001, 15 (03) :316-321
[10]   RETRACTED: The influence of intravascular volume therapy with a new hydroxyethyl starch preparation (6% HES 130/0.4) on coagulation in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery (Retracted Article) [J].
Haisch, G ;
Boldt, J ;
Krebs, C ;
Kumle, B ;
Suttner, S ;
Schulz, A .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2001, 92 (03) :565-571