Prognostic significance of circumferential margin involvement in rectal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and low anterior resection

被引:66
|
作者
Luna-Pérez, P
Bustos-Cholico, E
Alvarado, I
Maffuz, A
Rodríguez-Ramírez, S
De La Barrera, MG
Labastida, S
机构
[1] Hosp Oncol, Ctr Med Nacl Siglo 21, Inst Mexicano Seguro Social, Colorectal Serv,Surg Oncol Dept, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Hosp Oncol, Ctr Med Nacl Siglo 21, Inst Mexicano Seguro Social, Dept Pathol, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[3] Hosp Oncol, Ctr Med Nacl Siglo 21, Inst Mexicano Seguro Social, Stat Sect, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
关键词
rectal cancer; neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy; complete response; lymph node metastasis; total mesorectal excision;
D O I
10.1002/jso.20232
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Histologic examination of circumferential margins is an important predictor of local and distant relapse in non-radiated rectal cancer. However, for patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy this role has not yet been addressed. Methods: From January 1995 to December 1997, 61 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma located between 0 and 10 cm from anal verge with invasion into perirectal fat assessed by rectal ultrasound were included. All patients received 45 Gy + bolus infusion of 5-FU (450 mg/m(2)/days 1-5, 28-33 of RT); 4-6 weeks later, surgery was performed. Circumferential margin was assessed (< 2 mm was considered as positive). Five-year survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and comparison of groups with log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to find risk factors affecting local control and survival. Results: There were 35 males and 26 females, mean age 60.3 years. Twelve patients (19.7%) had circumferential margin involvement. Median follow-up was 44 months. Overall local recurrence was observed in 6 of 61 patients (9.8%); in patients without circumferential margin involvement this was 8%, whereas it was 16% in those with circumferential margin involvement (P = 0.33). Distant recurrence was observed in 22% of patients without circumferential margin involvement; conversely, it was 58.3% in those with involvement (P = 0.02). Five-year survival of patients without circumferential resection involvement margin was 81%, while it was 42% in patients with circumferential involvement (P = 0.006). Conclusions: In patients with rectal cancer treated by preoperative chemoradiation plus total mesorectal excision (TME) and sphincter saving surgery, circumferential margin involvement is associated with high incidence of distant recurrence and cancer-related death. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 25
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] The prognostic significance of stapler doughnuts' examination at low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Spartalis, Eleftherios
    Moris, Demetrios
    Athanasiou, Antonios
    Kykalos, Stylianos
    Dimitroulis, Dimitrios
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2017, 32 (08) : 1233 - 1234
  • [32] Risk factors of circumferential resection margin involvement in the patients with extraperitoneal rectal cancer
    Oh, Sung Jin
    Shin, Jin Yong
    JOURNAL OF THE KOREAN SURGICAL SOCIETY, 2012, 82 (03): : 165 - 171
  • [33] Factors affecting circumferential resection margin involvement after rectal cancer excision
    Tilney, Henry S.
    Tekkis, Paris P.
    Sains, Parvinder S.
    Constantinides, Vasilis A.
    Heriot, Alexander G.
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2007, 50 (01) : 29 - 36
  • [34] Loop ostomy following laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Wu, Xin
    Lin, Guole
    Qiu, Huizhong
    Xiao, Yi
    Wu, Bin
    Zhong, Miner
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2018, 23
  • [35] Redefining the Positive Circumferential Resection Margin by Incorporating Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Treatment Response in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Multicenter Validation Study
    Lee, Joo Ho
    Chie, Eui Kyu
    Jeong, Seung-Yong
    Kim, Tae-You
    Kim, Dae Yong
    Kim, Tae Hyun
    Kim, Sun Young
    Baek, Ji Yeon
    Chang, Hee Jin
    Kim, Min Ju
    Park, Sung Chan
    Oh, Jae Hwan
    Kim, Sung Hwan
    Lee, Jong Hoon
    Choi, Doo Ho
    Park, Hee Chul
    Kang, Sung-Bum
    Kim, Jae-Sung
    CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2018, 50 (02): : 506 - 517
  • [36] Circumferential resection margin as a prognostic factor after rectal cancer surgery: A large population-based retrospective study
    Liu, Qi
    Luo, Dakui
    Cai, Sanjun
    Li, Qingguo
    Li, Xinxiang
    CANCER MEDICINE, 2018, 7 (08): : 3673 - 3681
  • [37] Variations in Pelvic Dimensions Do Not Predict the Risk of Circumferential Resection Margin (CRM) Involvement in Rectal Cancer
    G. Salerno
    I. R. Daniels
    G. Brown
    A. R. Norman
    B. J. Moran
    R. J. Heald
    World Journal of Surgery, 2007, 31 : 1315 - 1322
  • [38] Impact of specific modes of circumferential resection margin involvement in rectal cancer local recurrence: A retrospective study
    Suarez, Javier
    Goicoetxea, Andrea
    Gomez, M. L.
    Jimenez, G.
    Llanos, M. C.
    Jimenez, J.
    Montes, B.
    de Miguel, M.
    JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 118 (07) : 1122 - 1128
  • [39] Circumferential Resection Margin Status as a Predictive Factor for Recurrence in Preoperative MRI for Advanced Lower Rectal Cancer Without Preoperative Therapy
    Mazaki, Junichi
    Tsukamoto, Shunsuke
    Miyake, Mototaka
    Moritani, Konosuke
    Sakamoto, Ryohei
    Shida, Dai
    Kanemitsu, Yukihide
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2021, 64 (01) : 71 - 80
  • [40] The clinical significance of a pathologically positive lymph node at the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer
    A. Patel
    N. Green
    P. Sarmah
    G. Langman
    K. Chandrakumaran
    H. Youssef
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2019, 23 : 151 - 159