Prognostic significance of circumferential margin involvement in rectal adenocarcinoma treated with preoperative chemoradiotherapy and low anterior resection

被引:66
|
作者
Luna-Pérez, P
Bustos-Cholico, E
Alvarado, I
Maffuz, A
Rodríguez-Ramírez, S
De La Barrera, MG
Labastida, S
机构
[1] Hosp Oncol, Ctr Med Nacl Siglo 21, Inst Mexicano Seguro Social, Colorectal Serv,Surg Oncol Dept, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[2] Hosp Oncol, Ctr Med Nacl Siglo 21, Inst Mexicano Seguro Social, Dept Pathol, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
[3] Hosp Oncol, Ctr Med Nacl Siglo 21, Inst Mexicano Seguro Social, Stat Sect, Mexico City, DF, Mexico
关键词
rectal cancer; neo-adjuvant chemoradiotherapy; complete response; lymph node metastasis; total mesorectal excision;
D O I
10.1002/jso.20232
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Introduction: Histologic examination of circumferential margins is an important predictor of local and distant relapse in non-radiated rectal cancer. However, for patients who received preoperative chemoradiotherapy this role has not yet been addressed. Methods: From January 1995 to December 1997, 61 patients with rectal adenocarcinoma located between 0 and 10 cm from anal verge with invasion into perirectal fat assessed by rectal ultrasound were included. All patients received 45 Gy + bolus infusion of 5-FU (450 mg/m(2)/days 1-5, 28-33 of RT); 4-6 weeks later, surgery was performed. Circumferential margin was assessed (< 2 mm was considered as positive). Five-year survival was calculated by Kaplan-Meier method and comparison of groups with log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression analysis was performed to find risk factors affecting local control and survival. Results: There were 35 males and 26 females, mean age 60.3 years. Twelve patients (19.7%) had circumferential margin involvement. Median follow-up was 44 months. Overall local recurrence was observed in 6 of 61 patients (9.8%); in patients without circumferential margin involvement this was 8%, whereas it was 16% in those with circumferential margin involvement (P = 0.33). Distant recurrence was observed in 22% of patients without circumferential margin involvement; conversely, it was 58.3% in those with involvement (P = 0.02). Five-year survival of patients without circumferential resection involvement margin was 81%, while it was 42% in patients with circumferential involvement (P = 0.006). Conclusions: In patients with rectal cancer treated by preoperative chemoradiation plus total mesorectal excision (TME) and sphincter saving surgery, circumferential margin involvement is associated with high incidence of distant recurrence and cancer-related death. (c) 2005 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:20 / 25
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Clinical Outcomes of Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer With Persistent Circumferential Resection Margin Invasion After Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy
    Kim, Chang Hyun
    Yeom, Seung-Seop
    Kwak, Hand-Duk
    Lee, Soo Young
    Ju, Jae Kyun
    Kim, Young Jin
    Kim, Hyeong Rok
    ANNALS OF COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2019, 35 (02) : 72 - 82
  • [22] The adequacy of the distal resection margin after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer
    Kim, T. G.
    Park, W.
    Choi, D. H.
    Kim, S. -H.
    Kim, H. C.
    Lee, W. Y.
    Park, J. O.
    Park, Y. S.
    COLORECTAL DISEASE, 2014, 16 (08) : O257 - O263
  • [23] The clinical significance of a pathologically positive lymph node at the circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer
    Patel, A.
    Green, N.
    Sarmah, P.
    Langman, G.
    Chandrakumaran, K.
    Youssef, H.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2019, 23 (02) : 151 - 159
  • [24] Surgical outcomes of robotic, laparoscopic, and open low anterior resection after preoperative chemoradiotherapy for patients with advanced lower rectal cancer
    Lim, Sukchol
    Nagai, Yuzo
    Nozawa, Hiroaki
    Kawai, Kazushige
    Sasaki, Kazuhito
    Murono, Koji
    Emoto, Shigenobu
    Yokoyama, Yuichiro
    Ozawa, Tsuyoshi
    Abe, Shinya
    Anzai, Hiroyuki
    Sonoda, Hirofumi
    Ishihara, Soichiro
    SURGERY TODAY, 2023, 53 (01) : 109 - 115
  • [25] Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer and the predictive role of endoluminal ultrasonography
    T D Reid
    D S Y Chan
    S A Roberts
    T D L Crosby
    G T Williams
    W G Lewis
    British Journal of Cancer, 2012, 107 : 1925 - 1931
  • [26] Prognostic impact of circumferential resection margin in esophageal cancer with or without neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
    Liu, C-Y
    Hsu, P-K
    Hsu, H-S
    Wu, Y-C
    Chuang, C-Y
    Lin, C-H
    Hsu, C-P
    DISEASES OF THE ESOPHAGUS, 2020, 33 (09)
  • [27] Prognostic significance of circumferential resection margin involvement following oesophagectomy for cancer and the predictive role of endoluminal ultrasonography
    Reid, T. D.
    Chan, D. S. Y.
    Roberts, S. A.
    Crosby, T. D. L.
    Williams, G. T.
    Lewis, W. G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2012, 107 (12) : 1925 - 1931
  • [28] Do pathological variables have prognostic significance in rectal adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and surgery?
    Bonetti, Luca Reggiani
    Lionti, Simona
    Domati, Federica
    Barresi, Valeria
    WORLD JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2017, 23 (08) : 1412 - 1423
  • [29] The prognostic significance of stapler doughnuts’ examination at low anterior resection for rectal cancer
    Eleftherios Spartalis
    Demetrios Moris
    Antonios Athanasiou
    Stylianos Kykalos
    Dimitrios Dimitroulis
    International Journal of Colorectal Disease, 2017, 32 : 1233 - 1234
  • [30] Does circumferential tumor location affect the circumferential resection margin status in mid and low rectal cancer?
    Kang, Byung Mo
    Park, Yong-Koo
    Park, Sun Jin
    Lee, Kil Yeon
    Kim, Chang Woo
    Lee, Suk-Hwan
    ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 41 (03) : 257 - 263