How robotics is changing and will change the field of colorectal surgery

被引:12
作者
Koerner, Crystal [1 ]
Rosen, Seth Alan [2 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Dept Surg, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Div Colorectal Surg, 100 Woodruff Circle, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
Robotic; Colorectal; Infrared; Intracorporeal; Simulation; Skills assessment; TOTAL MESORECTAL EXCISION; GREEN FLUORESCENCE ANGIOGRAPHY; AUTONOMIC NERVE PRESERVATION; RECTAL-CANCER; INDOCYANINE GREEN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; UROGENITAL FUNCTION; RIGHT COLECTOMY; TERM OUTCOMES; RESECTION;
D O I
10.4240/wjgs.v11.i10.381
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
During the last decade there has been a significant upward trend in colon and rectal minimally invasive surgery which can be attributed largely to the acceptance of robotic surgery platforms such as the da Vinci (R) robotic system. The fourth generation da Vinci (R) system, introduced in 2014, includes integrated table motion, intelligent laser targeted docking and more sophisticated instrumentation and imaging. These developments have enabled more surgeons to efficiently and safely perform multi-quadrant operations. Firefly (R) technology allows assessment of colon perfusion and identification of ureters, and has shown potential in detecting occult recurrence or metastasis using molecular-labelled tumor markers. Wristed instrumentation has increased the technical ease of intracorporeal anastomosis (ICA) for many surgeons, leading to more common use of ICA during right colectomy. Advanced imaging has shown potential to decrease the incidence of presacral nerve injury and improve urogenital outcomes after pelvic surgery, as has been the case in robotic urologic procedures. Finally, the robotic platform lends itself to surgical simulation for surgical trainees, as a pre-operative tool for mock operations and as an ongoing assessment tool for established colorectal surgeons. Given these advantages, surgeons should anticipate continued and increased utilization of this beneficial technology.
引用
收藏
页码:381 / 387
页数:7
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   Meta-analysis of short-term outcomes after laparoscopic resection for colorectal cancer [J].
Abraham, NS ;
Young, JM ;
Solomon, MJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2004, 91 (09) :1111-1124
[2]   External validation of Global Evaluative Assessment of Robotic Skills (GEARS) [J].
Aghazadeh, Monty A. ;
Jayaratna, Isuru S. ;
Hung, Andrew J. ;
Pan, Michael M. ;
Desai, Mihir M. ;
Gill, Inderbir S. ;
Goh, Alvin C. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2015, 29 (11) :3261-3266
[3]   A propensity score-matched comparison of intracorporeal and extracorporeal techniques for robotic-assisted right colectomy in an Enhanced Recovery Pathway [J].
Akram, Warqaa M. ;
Al-Natour, Riad H. ;
Albright, Jeremy ;
Wu, Juan ;
Ferraro, Jane ;
Shanker, Beth-Ann ;
McClure, Amanda M. ;
Cleary, Robert K. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2018, 216 (06) :1095-1100
[4]   Laparoscopic versus open surgery for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis [J].
Aziz, O ;
Constantinides, V ;
Tekkis, PP ;
Athanasiou, T ;
Purkayastha, S ;
Paraskeva, P ;
Darzi, AW ;
Heriot, AG .
ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2006, 13 (03) :413-424
[5]   Intraoperative use of ICG fluorescence imaging to reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Blanco-Colino, R. ;
Espin-Basany, E. .
TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2018, 22 (01) :15-23
[6]   Safety and effectiveness of SGM-101, a fluorescent antibody targeting carcinoembryonic antigen, for intraoperative detection of colorectal cancer: a dose-escalation pilot study [J].
Boogerd, Leonora S. F. ;
Hoogstins, Charlotte E. S. ;
Schaap, Dennis P. ;
Kusters, Miranda ;
Handgraaf, Henricus J. M. ;
van der Valk, Maxime J. M. ;
Hilling, Denise E. ;
Holman, Fabian A. ;
Peeters, Koen C. M. J. ;
Mieog, J. Sven D. ;
de Velde, Cornelis J. H. van ;
Farina-Sarasqueta, Arantza ;
van Lijnschoten, Ineke ;
Framery, Berenice ;
Pelegrin, Andre ;
Gutowski, Marian ;
Nienhuijs, Simon W. ;
de Hingh, Ignace H. J. T. ;
Nieuwenhuijzen, Grard A. P. ;
Rutten, Harm J. T. ;
Cailler, Francoise ;
Burggraaf, Jacobus ;
Vahrmeijer, Alexander L. .
LANCET GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 3 (03) :181-191
[7]   Proficiency training on a virtual reality robotic surgical skills curriculum [J].
Bric, Justin ;
Connolly, Michael ;
Kastenmeier, Andrew ;
Goldblatt, Matthew ;
Gould, Jon C. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2014, 28 (12) :3343-3348
[8]   Current state of virtual reality simulation in robotic surgery training: a review [J].
Bric, Justin D. ;
Lumbard, Derek C. ;
Frelich, Matthew J. ;
Gould, Jon C. .
SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2016, 30 (06) :2169-2178
[9]   Comparison of outcome and cost among open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgical treatments for rectal cancer: A propensity score matched analysis of nationwide inpatient sample data [J].
Chen, Szu-Ta ;
Wu, Meng-Che ;
Hsu, Tzu-Chun ;
Yen, Debra W. ;
Chang, Chia-Na ;
Hsu, Wan-Ting ;
Wang, Chia-Chun ;
Lee, Matthew ;
Liu, Shing-Hwa ;
Lee, Chien-Chang .
JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2018, 117 (03) :497-505
[10]   Intracorporeal versus extracorporeal anastomosis for minimally invasive right colectomy: A multi-center propensity score-matched comparison of outcomes [J].
Cleary, Robert K. ;
Kassir, Andrew ;
Johnson, Craig S. ;
Bastawrous, Amir L. ;
Soliman, Mark K. ;
Marx, Daryl S. ;
Giordano, Luca ;
Reidy, Tobi J. ;
Parra-Davila, Eduardo ;
Obias, Vincent J. ;
Carmichael, Joseph C. ;
Pollock, Darren ;
Pigazzi, Alessio .
PLOS ONE, 2018, 13 (10)