Characterization of EPID software for VMAT transit dosimetry

被引:18
作者
Esposito, Marco [1 ]
Bruschi, Andrea [3 ]
Bastiani, Paolo [2 ]
Ghirelli, Alessandro [1 ]
Pini, Silvia [1 ]
Russo, Serenella [1 ]
Zatelli, Giovanna [1 ]
机构
[1] SC Fis Sanit Azienda USL Toscana Ctr, Florence, Italy
[2] SC Radioterapia Azienda USL Toscana Ctr, Florence, Italy
[3] Casa Cura San Rossore, Pisa, Italy
关键词
VMAT; In vivo dosimetry; EPID; VOLUMETRIC-MODULATED ARC; DOSE VERIFICATION SYSTEM; QUALITY-ASSURANCE; CLINICAL IMPLEMENTATION; PASSING RATES; GAMMA INDEX; IMRT; THERAPY; QA; DELIVERY;
D O I
10.1007/s13246-018-0693-0
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
Dosimetry check (DC) is a commercial software that allows reconstruction of 3D dose distributions using transit electronic portal imaging device (EPID) images. In this work, we evaluated the suitability of DC software for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) transit dosimetry. The volumetric gamma agreement index 3%/3mm between twenty VMAT dose distributions reconstructed by DC and calculated with treatment planning system (TPS) were compared to those obtained using PTW OCTAVIUS (R) 4D to assess DC accuracy in VMAT quality assurance (QA). The sensitivity of DC in detecting VMAT delivery and set-up errors and anatomical variations has been investigated by measuring the variation of the gamma agreement index before and after the introduction of specific errors in four VMAT plans related to different anatomical sites. The influence of dose computation algorithm in presence of density inhomogeneity was also assessed. The assessment of VMAT QA shows agreements with TPS maps comparable to OCTAVIUS (R) 4D (OCT) in homogeneous phantom (p<0.001). DC mean gamma agreement index was 94.2%+/- 3.4, versus 95.6%+/- 2.5 of OCT, lower dose threshold was set to 10%. Introduction of deliberate errors resulted in lower gamma agreement index and in 38/56 cases the gamma agreement index was over the detection threshold. The dose computation algorithm of DC is accurate in all anatomical sites except lung. However in lung cases, the aqua vivo approach used in this work reduced the algorithm dependence of DC results. DC accurately reproduced VMAT 3D dose distributions in phantom and is sensitive to detect errors caused by delivery inaccuracy and anatomical variations of patients.
引用
收藏
页码:1021 / 1027
页数:7
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Evaluation of the Delta4 phantom for IMRT and VMAT verification [J].
Bedford, James L. ;
Lee, Young K. ;
Wai, Philip ;
South, Christopher P. ;
Warrington, Alan P. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2009, 54 (09) :N167-N176
[2]   COMMISSIONING OF VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC THERAPY (VMAT) [J].
Bedford, James L. ;
Warrington, Alan P. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 73 (02) :537-545
[3]   Experimental validation of a commercial 3D dose verification system for intensity-modulated arc therapies [J].
Boggula, Ramesh ;
Lorenz, Friedlieb ;
Mueller, Lutz ;
Birkner, Mattias ;
Wertz, Hansjoerg ;
Stieler, Florian ;
Steil, Volker ;
Lohr, Frank ;
Wenz, Frederik .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2010, 55 (19) :5619-5633
[4]   A quantification of the effectiveness of EPID dosimetry and software-based plan verification systems in detecting incidents in radiotherapy [J].
Bojechko, Casey ;
Phillps, Mark ;
Kalet, Alan ;
Ford, Eric C. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2015, 42 (09) :5363-5369
[5]   How the detector resolution affects the clinical significance of SBRT pre-treatment quality assurance results [J].
Bruschi, A. ;
Esposito, M. ;
Pini, S. ;
Ghirelli, A. ;
Zatelli, G. ;
Russo, S. .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2018, 49 :129-134
[6]  
Chaumet F., 2013, Physica Medica, V29, pe32, DOI DOI 10.1016/J.EJMP.2013.08.102
[7]   Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: Report of the IMRT subcommittee of the AAPM radiation therapy committee [J].
Ezzell, GA ;
Galvin, JM ;
Low, D ;
Palta, JR ;
Rosen, I ;
Sharpe, MB ;
Xia, P ;
Xiao, Y ;
Xing, L ;
Yu, CX .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (08) :2089-2115
[8]   IMRT commissioning: Multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119 [J].
Ezzell, Gary A. ;
Burmeister, Jay W. ;
Dogan, Nesrin ;
LoSasso, Thomas J. ;
Mechalakos, James G. ;
Mihailidis, Dimitris ;
Molineu, Andrea ;
Palta, Jatinder R. ;
Ramsey, Chester R. ;
Salter, Bill J. ;
Shi, Jie ;
Xia, Ping ;
Yue, Ning J. ;
Xiao, Ying .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (11) :5359-5373
[9]   Generalized EPID calibration for in vivo transit dosimetry [J].
Fidanzio, Andrea ;
Cilia, Savino ;
Greco, Francesca ;
Gargiulo, Laura ;
Azario, Luigi ;
Sabatino, Domenico ;
Piermattei, Angelo .
PHYSICA MEDICA-EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2011, 27 (01) :30-38
[10]   Quality assurance of RapidArc in clinical practice using portal dosimetry [J].
Fogliata, A. ;
Clivio, A. ;
Fenoglietto, P. ;
Hrbacek, J. ;
Kloeck, S. ;
Lattuada, P. ;
Mancosu, P. ;
Nicolini, G. ;
Parietti, E. ;
Urso, G. ;
Vanetti, E. ;
Cozzi, L. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2011, 84 (1002) :534-545