Potential for mitigating atmospheric ammonia in Canada

被引:13
作者
Bittman, S. [1 ]
Sheppard, S. C. [2 ]
Hunt, D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Agr & Agri Food Canada, Agassiz, BC VOM1A0, Canada
[2] ECOMatters Inc, Pinawa, MB R0E 1L0, Canada
关键词
Ammonia; emissions; livestock; mitigation; MONTHLY NH3 EMISSIONS; PARTICULATE MATTER; AGRICULTURAL EMISSIONS; NITROGEN DEPOSITION; FARM PRACTICES; AIR-POLLUTION; UNITED-STATES; 12; ECOREGIONS; BEEF-CATTLE; MANURE;
D O I
10.1111/sum.12336
中图分类号
S15 [土壤学];
学科分类号
0903 ; 090301 ;
摘要
Most ammonia (NH3) emissions (85%) in Canada come from agricultural sources (400 kt/yr). There are international conventions that require countries to mitigate NH3 emissions but there are no federal or provincial guidelines in Canada stipulating emission targets or best practices for agriculture. This study examines the potential for mitigating atmospheric NH3 using a range of approaches. Taking current farm practices into account, employing proven low-cost measures (low-emission slurry application and slurry storage covers) would reduce annual emissions from livestock operations by 16 kt NH3-N, while using all available low-cost measures would reduce emissions by 79 kt NH3-N or 26% of livestock emissions. Another 36 kt/yr could be avoided by improving fertilizer practices, so that the total potential reduction would be about 29% of all agricultural emissions. Emissions from beef cattle and pig production could be reduced by 18% if consumption was cut by 50%, with greater mitigation if production for export was reduced, although the economic and social consequences need to be considered. Mitigation practices must be viewed in the context of possible pollution swapping especially in surplus nitrogen situations. Emissions must also be considered in terms of atmospheric NH3 transport to and from the USA, therefore bi-national agreements to jointly reduce emissions might be needed. It may be more cost-effective in Canada to strategically reduce emissions to minimize risks to health (from particulate matter) and the environment rather than to reduce annual national emission targets.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 275
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]   Particulate Matter Air Pollution and Cardiovascular Disease An Update to the Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association [J].
Brook, Robert D. ;
Rajagopalan, Sanjay ;
Pope, C. Arden, III ;
Brook, Jeffrey R. ;
Bhatnagar, Aruni ;
Diez-Roux, Ana V. ;
Holguin, Fernando ;
Hong, Yuling ;
Luepker, Russell V. ;
Mittleman, Murray A. ;
Peters, Annette ;
Siscovick, David ;
Smith, Sidney C., Jr. ;
Whitsel, Laurie ;
Kaufman, Joel D. .
CIRCULATION, 2010, 121 (21) :2331-2378
[2]   Impacts of nitrogen and sulphur deposition on forest ecosystem services in Canada [J].
Aherne, Julian ;
Posch, Maximilian .
CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY, 2013, 5 (01) :108-115
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CANADA US AIR QUALIT
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2015, COSTS AMMONIA ABATEM
[5]  
Ayres J., 2010, 2008 CANADIAN ATMOSP, P7
[6]   Ecosystem responses to nitrogen deposition in the Colorado Front Range [J].
Baron, JS ;
Rueth, HM ;
Wolfe, AM ;
Nydick, KR ;
Allstott, EJ ;
Minear, JT ;
Moraska, B .
ECOSYSTEMS, 2000, 3 (04) :352-368
[7]  
Bittman S., 2014, Options for ammonia mitigation: Guidance from the UNECE Task Force on Reactive Nitrogen (Task Force Reactive Nitrogen Convention on Long Range Transboundary Air Pollution, Edinburgh, Wageningen and Aarhus)
[8]   Weekly agricultural emissions and ambient concentrations of ammonia: Validation of an emission inventory [J].
Bittman, Shabtai ;
Jones, Keith ;
Vingarzan, Roxanne ;
Hunt, Derek E. ;
Sheppard, Steve C. ;
Tait, John ;
So, Rita ;
Zhao, Johanna .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2015, 113 :108-117
[9]   Reassessment of Critical Levels for Atmospheric Ammonia [J].
Cape, J. Neil ;
van der Eerden, Ludger J. ;
Sheppard, Lucy J. ;
Leith, Ian D. ;
Sutton, Mark A. .
ATMOSPHERIC AMMONIA: DETECTING EMISSION CHANGES AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, 2009, :15-+
[10]  
Chambers P.A., 2001, NUTR THEIR IMPACT CA