In vitro axial preload application during spine flexibility testing: towards reduced apparatus-related artefacts

被引:100
作者
Cripton, PA
Bruehlmann, SB
Orr, TE
Oxland, TR
Nolte, LP
机构
[1] Univ Bern, ME Muller Inst Biomech, CH-3010 Bern, Switzerland
[2] Queens Univ, Dept Mech Engn, Kingston, ON K7L 3N6, Canada
[3] Univ British Columbia, Dept Orthopaed, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada
关键词
spine; in vitro testing; preload; biomechanics; axial compression;
D O I
10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00145-7
中图分类号
Q6 [生物物理学];
学科分类号
071011 ;
摘要
Presently, there is little consensus about how, or even if, axial preload should be incorporated in spine flexibility tests in order to simulate the compressive loads naturally present in vivo. Some preload application methods are suspected of producing unwanted "artefact" forces as the specimen rotates and, in doing so, influencing the resulting kinematics. The objective of this study was to quantitatively compare four distinct types of preload which have roots in contemporary experimental practice. The specific quantities compared were the reaction moments and forces resulting at the intervertebral disc and specimen kinematics. The preload types incorporated increasing amounts of caudal constraint on the preload application vector ranging from an unconstrained dead-load arrangement to an apparatus that allowed the vector to follow rotations of the specimen. Six human cadaveric spine segments were tested (1-L1/L2, 3-L2/L3, 1-L3/L4 and 1-L4/L5). Pure moments were applied to the specimens with each of the four different types of compressive preload. Kinematic response was measured using an opto-electronic motion analysis system. A six-axis load cell was used to measure reaction forces and moments. Artefact reaction moments and shear forces were significantly affected by preload application method and magnitude. Unconstrained preload methods produced high artefact moments and low artefact shear forces while more constrained methods did the opposite. A mechanical trade-off is suggested by our results, whereby unwanted moment can only be prevented at the cost of shear force production. When comparing spine flexibility studies, caution should be exercised to ensure preload was applied in a similar manner for all studies. Unwanted moments or forces induced as a result of preload application method may render the comparison of two seemingly similar studies inappropriate. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1559 / 1568
页数:10
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] MECHANICAL TESTING OF THE SPINE - AN APPRAISAL OF METHODOLOGY, RESULTS, AND CONCLUSIONS
    ADAMS, MA
    [J]. SPINE, 1995, 20 (19) : 2151 - 2156
  • [2] VARIATION OF LUMBAR SPINE STIFFNESS WITH LOAD
    EDWARDS, WT
    HAYES, WC
    POSNER, I
    WHITE, AA
    MANN, RW
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1987, 109 (01): : 35 - 41
  • [3] LOAD SHARING AMONG SPINAL ELEMENTS OF A MOTION SEGMENT IN EXTENSION AND LATERAL BENDING
    GOEL, VK
    WINTERBOTTOM, JM
    WEINSTEIN, JN
    KIM, YE
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICAL ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1987, 109 (04): : 291 - 297
  • [4] DISTRACTION AND COMPRESSION LOADS ENHANCE SPINE TORSIONAL STIFFNESS
    GOODWIN, RR
    JAMES, KS
    DANIELS, AU
    DUNN, HK
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1994, 27 (08) : 1049 - 1057
  • [6] HOFFER Z, 1998, P 44 ANN ORTH RES SO
  • [7] LARGE COMPRESSIVE PRELOADS DECREASE LUMBAR MOTION SEGMENT FLEXIBILITY
    JANEVIC, J
    ASHTONMILLER, JA
    SCHULTZ, AB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH, 1991, 9 (02) : 228 - 236
  • [8] DYNAMICS OF HUMAN LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL JOINTS - EXPERIMENTAL AND FINITE-ELEMENT INVESTIGATIONS
    KASRA, M
    SHIRAZIADL, A
    DROUIN, G
    [J]. SPINE, 1992, 17 (01) : 93 - 102
  • [9] KAZARIAN L, 1972, ACTA ORTHOP SCAND, P1
  • [10] MECHANICAL RESPONSE OF LUMBAR INTERVERTEBRAL JOINT UNDER PHYSIOLOGICAL (COMPLEX) LOADING
    LIN, HS
    LIU, YK
    ADAMS, KH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1978, 60 (01) : 41 - 55