Comparative Life-Cycle Assessment Analysis of Power-to-Methane Plants Including Different Water Electrolysis Technologies and CO2 Sources While Applying Various Energy Scenarios

被引:24
作者
Gerloff, Niklas [1 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Clausthal, Res Ctr Energy Storage Technol EST, D-38640 Goslar, Germany
关键词
power to methane; synthetic natural gas; CO2; source; life-cycle assessment; environmental impacts; greener production; ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT; HYDROGEN-PRODUCTION; GAS; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1021/acssuschemeng.1c02002
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Germany's energy system is transitioning to a more renewable one, leading to new challenges, such as in the wintertime, when solar and wind energy are less accessible. Power to methane (PtM) can, thusly, serve as a long-term storage solution, as the natural gas grid already exists, therefore reducing costs. The study aims for analysis of potential environmental impacts of synthetic natural gas (SNG) production in different PtM plants.including the electrolysis technologies such as alkaline electrolysis (AEL), polymer electrolysis membrane (PEM), and solid oxide electrolysis cell (SOEC).applying various energy scenarios.2019, 2030, 2050, and renewable energy (RE).to show which technology accounts for the lowest CO2 equiv and is potentially the most environmentally friendly, and to compare results to the potential environmental impacts of conventional natural gas production and CO2 emissions of conventional alternatives. The PtM-SOEC shows the lowest CO2 equiv for the scenarios in 2019, 2030, and 2050.PtM-AEL for RE.and is potentially the most environmentally friendly technology regarding 2019's and 2030's scenarios. This applies to PtM-PEM for 2050's scenario as well as RE's. The conventional natural gas production accounts for less potential environmental impacts than SNG. Only the RE scenario results are lower or within the range of CO2 emissions of considered conventional alternatives.
引用
收藏
页码:10123 / 10141
页数:19
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Altfeld K., 2013, ADMISSIBLE HYDROGEN
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2018, Commission Staff Working Document No 1176/2011, P221
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2006, ISO 14040 2006 ENV M
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2016, [No title captured]
[5]   Life cycle assessment of hydrogen from proton exchange membrane water electrolysis in future energy systems [J].
Bareiss, Kay ;
de la Rua, Cristina ;
Moeckl, Maximilian ;
Hamacher, Thomas .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2019, 237 :862-872
[6]   Life Cycle Assessment of Synthetic Natural Gas Production from Different CO2 Sources: A Cradle-to-Gate Study [J].
Bargiacchi, Eleonora ;
Thonemann, Nils ;
Geldermann, Jutta ;
Antonelli, Marco ;
Desideri, Umberto .
ENERGIES, 2020, 13 (17)
[7]  
Battelle Memorial Institute, 2016, DOE contract No. DE-EE0005250
[8]   Life cycle assessment integration into energy system models: An application for Power-to-Methane in the EU [J].
Blanco, Herib ;
Codina, Victor ;
Laurent, Alexis ;
Nijs, Wouter ;
Marechal, Francois ;
Faaij, Andre .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 259
[9]   Projecting cost development for future large-scale power-to-gas implementations by scaling effects [J].
Boehm, Hans ;
Zauner, Andreas ;
Rosenfeld, Daniel C. ;
Tichler, Robert .
APPLIED ENERGY, 2020, 264
[10]  
Breitkopf A., ENTWICKLUNG CO2 EMIS