OPERATING CONDITIONS INFLUENCE ON VMD AND SGMD FOR ETHANOL RECOVERY FROM AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS

被引:4
作者
Cotamo-De la Espriella, Ricardo-Javier [1 ]
Baron-Nunez, Fredy-Wsvaldo [1 ]
Muvdi-Nova, Carlos-Jesus [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ind Santander, Sch Chem Engn, Santander, Colombia
来源
CT&F-CIENCIA TECNOLOGIA Y FUTURO | 2015年 / 6卷 / 02期
关键词
Membrane distillation; Separation process; Ethanol; VMD; SGMD; GAS MEMBRANE DISTILLATION; PERVAPORATION; DEHYDRATION; SEPARATION; MIXTURES; REMOVAL; FLUX;
D O I
10.29047/01225383.21
中图分类号
TE [石油、天然气工业]; TK [能源与动力工程];
学科分类号
0807 ; 0820 ;
摘要
This work focuses on Vacuum Membrane Distillation (VMD) and Sweeping Gas Membrane Distillation (SGMD) as a separating technique of ethanol from aqueous solutions. VMD was studied at moderate temperature (30, 40 and 50 degrees C) and pressure (0.11, 0.20 and 0.30 atm) conditions, whereas SGMD was studied at different temperatures (50 and 70 degrees C) and air-flow rates (10x10(-6) and 20x10(-6) m(3).min(-1)). These techniques were experimentally studied using prepared ethanol-water solutions and fermented broths, with ethanol at 10% w/w. Under these operating conditions and using prepared ethanol-water solutions, an average total flux of 22.61 and 1.6 kg.m(-2).h(-1), and concentration factors of 2.3 and 1.7 were obtained for VMD and SGMD, respectively. For fermented broths, total flux of 17.66 and 0.9 kg.m(-2).h(-1), and concentration factors of 1.8 and 1.9 were obtained for VMD and SGMD, respectively. The fouling impact was also studied, finding a significant effect of pressure (vacuum) for VMD technique; mainly due to the biomass presence in the solution. Experimental results show that applying pressurization/depressurization cycles decreases membrane fouling, stabilizing flux and concentration in the permeate. While for SGMD configuration, the incidence of fouling was significantly lower.
引用
收藏
页码:69 / 80
页数:12
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Membrane distillation: A comprehensive review [J].
Alkhudhiri, Abdullah ;
Darwish, Naif ;
Hilal, Nidal .
DESALINATION, 2012, 287 :2-18
[2]  
Baker R, 2004, MEMBRANE TECHNOLOGY, V2
[3]   Fundamentals and applications of pervaporation through zeolite membranes [J].
Bowen, TC ;
Noble, RD ;
Falconer, JL .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2004, 245 (1-2) :1-33
[4]   Comparison of various membrane distillation methods for desalination using hydrophobic ceramic membranes [J].
Cerneaux, Sophie ;
Struzynska, Izabela ;
Kujawski, Wojciech M. ;
Persin, Michel ;
Larbot, Andre .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2009, 337 (1-2) :55-60
[5]   Membranes for the dehydration of solvents by pervaporation [J].
Chapman, Peter D. ;
Oliveira, Teresa ;
Livingston, Andrew G. ;
Li, K. .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2008, 318 (1-2) :5-37
[6]   Sweeping gas membrane distillation of sucrose aqueous solutions: Response surface modeling and optimization [J].
Cojocaru, C. ;
Khayet, M. .
SEPARATION AND PURIFICATION TECHNOLOGY, 2011, 81 (01) :12-24
[7]   Direct contact membrane distillation (DCMD): Experimental study on the commercial PTFE membrane and modeling [J].
Hwang, Ho Jung ;
He, Ke ;
Gray, Stephen ;
Zhang, Jianhua ;
Moon, Il Shik .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2011, 371 (1-2) :90-98
[8]   Factors affecting flux and ethanol separation performance in vacuum membrane distillation (VMD) [J].
Izquierdo-Gil, MA ;
Jonsson, G .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2003, 214 (01) :113-130
[9]  
Jaramillo Pineda Oscar Johnny, 2012, Rev. ion, V25, P51
[10]   Porous hydrophobic/hydrophilic composite membranes - Application in desalination using direct contact membrane distillation [J].
Khayet, M ;
Mengual, JI ;
Matsuura, T .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2005, 252 (1-2) :101-113