The Blind Spot in Risk Ethics: Managing Natural Hazards

被引:32
作者
Doorn, Neelke [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Technol Policy & Management, NL-2600 GA Delft, Netherlands
关键词
Distribution problem; ethics; natural hazard; responsibility; CONSENT;
D O I
10.1111/risa.12293
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Many risk scholars recognize the importance of including ethical considerations in risk management. Risk ethics can provide in-depth ethical analysis so that ethical considerations can be part of risk-related decisions, rather than an afterthought to those decisions. In this article, I present a brief sketch of the field of risk ethics. I argue that risk ethics has a bias toward technological hazards, thereby overlooking the risks that stem from natural and semi-natural hazards. In order to make a contribution to the field of risk research, risks ethics should broaden its scope to include natural and semi-natural hazards and develop normative distribution criteria that can support decision making on such hazards.
引用
收藏
页码:354 / 360
页数:7
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], RISK AND REASON
[2]  
[Anonymous], ETHICS TECHNOLOGICAL
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2012, HDB RISK THEORY
[4]  
[Anonymous], RISK UNCERTAINTY PRO
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2013, PUBLIC REASON
[6]   A semi-quantitative approach to risk analysis, as an alternative to QRAs [J].
Aven, Terje .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2008, 93 (06) :790-797
[7]   On the ethical justification for the use of risk acceptance criteria [J].
Aven, Terje .
RISK ANALYSIS, 2007, 27 (02) :303-312
[8]   On risk defined as an event where the outcome is uncertain [J].
Aven, Terje ;
Renn, Ortwin .
JOURNAL OF RISK RESEARCH, 2009, 12 (01) :1-11
[9]   FALLACY OF SINGLE RISK [J].
AXINN, S .
PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE, 1966, 33 (1-2) :154-162
[10]  
BROOME J, 1991, P ARISTOTELIAN SOC, V91, P87