Semantic search during creative thinking: A quantitative analysis based on cumulative distribution and semantic similarity of responses

被引:2
作者
Chen Yanran [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liang Zheng [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhao Qingbai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Huang Yu [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Li Songqing [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Yu Quanlei [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhou Zhijin [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Minist Educ, Key Lab Adolescent Cyberpsychol & Behav CCNU, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
[2] Cent China Normal Univ, Sch Psychol, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
[3] Key Lab Human Dev & Mental Hlth Hubei Prov, Wuhan 430079, Peoples R China
[4] Naval Univ Engn, Coll Elect Engn, Wuhan 430034, Peoples R China
关键词
creative thinking; semantic search; negative acceleration; clustering; semantic similarity; DIVERGENT THINKING; FLEXIBILITY;
D O I
10.3724/SP.J.1041.2022.00881
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The semantic search during creative thinking refers to the activation process of semantic information in long-term memory involved in creative activities. Influential theory has posited that the semantic activation process in free recall shows spreading activation within semantic networks and is characterized by negative acceleration and clustering. Unlike the free recall, it is necessary to suppress the dominant response and to activate novel and distant information during creative thinking. Therefore, one might expect different semantic search processes during creative thinking, but such a hypothesis has not yet been directly tested. To explore the semantic search process during creative thinking, the present study described the quantitative dynamic characteristics of answer generation in a divergent thinking test using a series of parameters, such as cumulative response distribution and semantic similarity. The experiment employed a within-subject design with the task type (novel V. S. normal) as the independent variable. The experiment included two versions of alternative uses task (AUT): novel and normal AUT. In the novel AUT, participants were asked to report novel and valid uses for the daily-life items presented on the screen as many as possible, while in the normal AUT they were only asked to think of valid uses for objects as many as possible. During the experiment, participants completed two normal AUTs, followed by two novel AUTs. Each AUT lasted for three minutes. The novelty of responses and semantic similarity of responses were scored by participants themselves. The time function of the cumulative number of responses was fitted by the hyperbolic function, and clustering analysis was conducted based on the semantic similarity of responses. The results showed that: ( 1) The cumulative response distribution in the novel AUT condition were negatively accelerating similar to semantic search during free recall, but the search speed in the novel AUT condition was slower than that of the normal AUT condition. (2) In the novel AUT condition, the semantic similarity between participants' responses and the questions ( i.e., the items) was low and significantly lower than that in the normal AUT condition. (3) The responses in the novel AUT condition showed a significantly lower degree of clustering than that in the normal AUT condition. In the novel AUT condition, the semantic similarity between the clusterable and non- clusterable answers and the questions were low and not significantly different. Furthermore, there was no significant difference between the clusterable and non-clusterable answers in terms of novelty. These findings indicated that the semantic search during creative thinking was partly in line with spreading activation theory of semantic search in free call. But the search speed was relatively slower. Furthermore, the novelty requirement prompted the participants to break up the semantic restriction of the item at the initial search and avoid nearby search. The participants tended to generate few idea in each semantic field. However, when it is far away from the item in the semantic field, individuals might generate clustering ideas.
引用
收藏
页码:881 / 891
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]   Divergent Thinking: New Methods, Recent Research, and Extended Theory [J].
Acar, Selcuk ;
Runco, Mark A. .
PSYCHOLOGY OF AESTHETICS CREATIVITY AND THE ARTS, 2019, 13 (02) :153-158
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2000, REV GEN PSYCHOL
[3]  
[白学军 Bai Xuejun], 2018, [心理学报, Acta Psychologica Sinica], V50, P1197, DOI 10.3724/sp.j.1041.2018.01197
[4]   Creative constraints: Brain activity and network dynamics underlying semantic interference during idea production [J].
Beaty, Roger E. ;
Christensen, Alexander P. ;
Benedek, Mathias ;
Silvia, Paul J. ;
Schacter, Daniel L. .
NEUROIMAGE, 2017, 148 :189-196
[5]   Does Insight Problem Solving Predict Real-World Creativity? [J].
Beaty, Roger E. ;
Nusbaum, Emily C. ;
Silvia, Paul J. .
PSYCHOLOGY OF AESTHETICS CREATIVITY AND THE ARTS, 2014, 8 (03) :287-292
[6]   The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition [J].
Beaty, Roger E. ;
Silvia, Paul J. ;
Nusbaum, Emily C. ;
Jauk, Emanuel ;
Benedek, Mathias .
MEMORY & COGNITION, 2014, 42 (07) :1186-1197
[7]   How semantic memory structure and intelligence contribute to creative thought: a network science approach [J].
Benedek, Mathias ;
Kenett, Yoed N. ;
Umdasch, Konstantin ;
Anaki, David ;
Faust, Miriam ;
Neubauer, Aljoscha C. .
THINKING & REASONING, 2017, 23 (02) :158-183
[8]   Revisiting Mednick's Model on Creativity-Related Differences in Associative Hierarchies. Evidence for a Common Path to Uncommon Thought [J].
Benedek, Mathias ;
Neubauer, Aljoscha C. .
JOURNAL OF CREATIVE BEHAVIOR, 2013, 47 (04) :273-289
[9]   Associative Abilities Underlying Creativity [J].
Benedek, Mathias ;
Koenen, Tanja ;
Neubauer, Aljoscha C. .
PSYCHOLOGY OF AESTHETICS CREATIVITY AND THE ARTS, 2012, 6 (03) :273-281
[10]   A matched filter hypothesis for cognitive control [J].
Chrysikou, Evangelia G. ;
Weber, Matthew J. ;
Thompson-Schill, Sharon L. .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 2014, 62 :341-355