The effect of time-of-flight and point spread function modeling on 82Rb myocardial perfusion imaging of obese patients

被引:6
作者
Dasari, Paul K. R. [1 ]
Jones, Judson P. [2 ]
Casey, Michael E. [2 ]
Liang, Yuanyuan [3 ]
Dilsizian, Vasken [1 ]
Smith, Mark F. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Diagnost Radiol & Nucl Med, 22 South Greene St, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
[2] Siemens Healthineers, Knoxville, TN USA
[3] Univ Maryland, Sch Med, Dept Epidemiol & Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21201 USA
关键词
POSITRON-EMISSION-TOMOGRAPHY; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; DIAGNOSTIC-ACCURACY; PET RECONSTRUCTION; CARDIAC PET; BLOOD-FLOW; SPECT; IMPACT; TOF; INFORMATION;
D O I
10.1007/s12350-018-1311-y
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
The effect of time-of-flight (TOF) and point spread function (PSF) modeling in image reconstruction has not been well studied for cardiac PET. This study assesses their separate and combined influence on Rb-82 myocardial perfusion imaging in obese patients. Thirty-six obese patients underwent rest-stress Rb-82 cardiac PET. Images were reconstructed with and without TOF and PSF modeling. Perfusion was quantitatively compared using the AHA 17-segment model for patients grouped by BMI, cross-sectional body area in the scanner field of view, gender, and left ventricular myocardial volume. Summed rest scores (SRS), summed stress scores (SSS), and summed difference scores (SDS) were compared. TOF improved polar map visual uniformity and increased septal wall perfusion by up to 10%. This increase was greater for larger patients, more evident for patients grouped by cross-sectional area than by BMI, and more prominent for females. PSF modeling increased perfusion by about 1.5% in all cardiac segments. TOF modeling generally decreased SRS and SSS with significant decreases between 2.4 and 3.0 (P < .05), which could affect risk stratification; SDS remained about the same. With PSF modeling, SRS, SSS, and SDS were largely unchanged. TOF and PSF modeling affect regional and global perfusion, SRS, and SSS. Clinicians should consider these effects and gender-dependent differences when interpreting Rb-82 perfusion studies.
引用
收藏
页码:1521 / 1545
页数:25
相关论文
共 49 条
[41]   Clinical validation of high-resolution image reconstruction algorithms in brain 18F-FDG-PET: effect of incorporating Gaussian filter, point spread function, and time-of-flight [J].
Nagaki, Akio ;
Onoguchi, Masahisa ;
Matsutomo, Norikazu .
NUCLEAR MEDICINE COMMUNICATIONS, 2014, 35 (12) :1224-1232
[42]   Influences of point-spread function and time-of-flight reconstructions on standardized uptake value of lymph node metastases in FDG-PET [J].
Akamatsu, Go ;
Mitsumoto, Katsuhiko ;
Taniguchi, Takafumi ;
Tsutsui, Yuji ;
Baba, Shingo ;
Sasaki, Masayuki .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2014, 83 (01) :226-230
[43]   The association of tumor-to-background ratios and SUVmax deviations related to point spread function and time-of-flight F18-FDG-PET/CT reconstruction in colorectal liver metastases [J].
Rogasch, Julian M. M. ;
Steffen, Ingo G. ;
Hofheinz, Frank ;
Grosser, Oliver S. ;
Furth, Christian ;
Mohnike, Konrad ;
Hass, Peter ;
Walke, Mathias ;
Apostolova, Ivayla ;
Amthauer, Holger .
EJNMMI RESEARCH, 2015, 5 :1-9
[44]   The influence of different signal-to-background ratios on spatial resolution and F18-FDG-PET quantification using point spread function and time-of-flight reconstruction [J].
Rogasch J.M.M. ;
Hofheinz F. ;
Lougovski A. ;
Furth C. ;
Ruf J. ;
Großer O.S. ;
Mohnike K. ;
Hass P. ;
Walke M. ;
Amthauer H. ;
Steffen I.G. .
EJNMMI Physics, 1 (1) :1-16
[45]   Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF) [J].
Julian M. Rogasch ;
Said Suleiman ;
Frank Hofheinz ;
Stephanie Bluemel ;
Mathias Lukas ;
Holger Amthauer ;
Christian Furth .
EJNMMI Physics, 7
[46]   Reconstructed spatial resolution and contrast recovery with Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction (Q.Clear) for FDG-PET compared to time-of-flight (TOF) with point spread function (PSF) [J].
Rogasch, Julian M. ;
Suleiman, Said ;
Hofheinz, Frank ;
Bluemel, Stephanie ;
Lukas, Mathias ;
Amthauer, Holger ;
Furth, Christian .
EJNMMI PHYSICS, 2020, 7 (01)
[47]   The association of tumor-to-background ratios and SUVmax deviations related to point spread function and time-of-flight F18-FDG-PET/CT reconstruction in colorectal liver metastases [J].
Julian MM Rogasch ;
Ingo G Steffen ;
Frank Hofheinz ;
Oliver S Großer ;
Christian Furth ;
Konrad Mohnike ;
Peter Hass ;
Mathias Walke ;
Ivayla Apostolova ;
Holger Amthauer .
EJNMMI Research, 5
[48]   The value of Bayesian penalized likelihood reconstruction for improving lesion conspicuity of malignant lung tumors on 18F-FDG PET/CT: comparison with ordered subset expectation maximization reconstruction incorporating time-of-flight model and point spread function correction [J].
Kurita, Yoshie ;
Ichikawa, Yasutaka ;
Nakanishi, Toshihiro ;
Tomita, Yoya ;
Hasegawa, Daisuke ;
Murashima, Shuichi ;
Hirano, Tadanori ;
Sakuma, Hajime .
ANNALS OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2020, 34 (04) :272-279
[49]   Independent prognostic value of left ventricular contractile reserve and chronotropic response in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction undergoing vasodilator stress myocardial perfusion imaging with Rb-82 positron emission tomography [J].
Tamarappoo, Balaji K. ;
Ling, Lee Fong ;
Cerqueira, Manuel ;
Hachamovitch, Rory .
EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING, 2018, 19 (04) :442-449