Farmer knowledge and the intention to use smartphone-based information management technologies in Uganda

被引:17
作者
Ahikiriza, Elizabeth [1 ,2 ]
Wesana, Joshua [1 ,3 ]
Van Huylenbroeck, Guido [1 ]
Kabbiri, Ronald [3 ,4 ]
De Steur, Hans [1 ]
Lauwers, Ludwig [1 ,5 ]
Gellynck, Xavier [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Ghent, Dept Agr Econ, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
[2] Makerere Univ, Dept Agribusiness & Nat Resources Econ, POB 7062, Kampala, Uganda
[3] Mt Moon Univ, Fac Agr & Environm Sci, POB 837, Fort Portal, Uganda
[4] Busitema Univ, Dept Agribusiness & Extens, POB 236, Tororo, Uganda
[5] Flanders Res Inst Agr Fisheries & Food ILVO, Social Sci Unit, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
关键词
Awareness; Developing countries; ICT; Smartphone Apps; Technology acceptance; SOCIAL COGNITIVE THEORY; SELF-EFFICACY; DECISION-MAKING; UNIFIED THEORY; E-GOVERNMENT; ACCEPTANCE; PERSPECTIVES; PERCEPTIONS; ADOPTION; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.compag.2022.107413
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
Interest in using smartphone-based technologies for farm management is growing. However, existing research does not adequately address the effect of farmer knowledge and awareness in their intention to use such technologies. The aim of the present study is to identify the main factors that influence farmer intention to use a Farm Management Smartphone App (FMSA), with an emphasis on farmer knowledge. Ugandan dairy cattle farmers (n = 206) were interviewed before and after a training session that focused on the use of FMSA. The resulting data included farmer socio-demographics, data on their knowledge about the use of smartphones and related applications, and constructs of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) extended with selfefficacy. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to examine the determinants of intention to use the FMSA. Farmer intention to use is mainly determined by self-efficacy, facilitating conditions and performance expectancy before exposure to the App. In contrast, the influence of effort expectancy and social influence only emerged after completing the training. FMSA and similar technologies should therefore be as user-friendly as possible to sustain the farmers' intention to use an App. Promotional strategies should be designed to target specific characteristics of intended users.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Visible/Near Infrared (VIS/NIR) spectroscopy as an optical sensor for evaluating olive oil quality [J].
Abu-Khalaf, Nawaf ;
Hmidat, Mohammed .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2020, 173
[2]  
Abubakar F.M., 2013, AUSTR J BUSINESS MAN, V3, P14, DOI DOI 10.52283/NSWRCA.AJBMR.20130302A02
[3]   Context Specificity and Time Dependency in Classifying Sub-Saharan Africa Dairy Cattle Farmers for Targeted Extension Farm Advice: The Case of Uganda [J].
Ahikiriza, Elizabeth ;
Wesana, Joshua ;
Gellynck, Xavier ;
Van Huylenbroeck, Guido ;
Lauwers, Ludwig .
AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2021, 11 (09)
[4]  
Ahmed Umair, 2016, [The Journal of Industrial Distribution & Business, 산경연구논집], V7, P13
[5]  
Akinnuwesi Boluwaji A., 2016, International Journal of Business Information Systems, V23, P482
[6]   Adaptation of global land use and management intensity to changes in climate and atmospheric carbon dioxide [J].
Alexander, Peter ;
Rabin, Sam ;
Anthoni, Peter ;
Henry, Roslyn ;
Pugh, Thomas A. M. ;
Rounsevell, Mark D. A. ;
Arneth, Almut .
GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY, 2018, 24 (07) :2791-2809
[7]   Consumer use of mobile banking (M-Banking) in Saudi Arabia: Towards an integrated model [J].
Baabdullah, Abdullah M. ;
Alalwan, Ali Abdallah ;
Rana, Nripendra P. ;
Kizgin, Hatice ;
Patil, Pushp .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT, 2019, 44 :38-52
[8]  
Balikowa D., 2011, DAIRY DEV UGANDA
[9]   SELF-EFFICACY - TOWARD A UNIFYING THEORY OF BEHAVIORAL CHANGE [J].
BANDURA, A .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1977, 84 (02) :191-215
[10]   Assessment of an application for touchscreen devices to record calving-related events in dairy herds and monitor personnel performance [J].
Barragan, A. A. ;
Workman, J. D. ;
Bas, S. ;
Proudfoot, K. L. ;
Schuenemann, G. M. .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 2016, 99 (07) :5662-5670