Experimental and numerical comparisons of self-reacting point absorber wave energy converters in irregular waves

被引:37
作者
Beatty, Scott J. [1 ]
Bocking, Bryce [1 ]
Bubbar, Kush [3 ]
Buckham, Bradley J. [2 ]
Wild, Peter [2 ]
机构
[1] MarineLabs Data Syst Inc, 2A-4476 Markham St, Victoria, BC V8Z 7X8, Canada
[2] Univ Victoria, Stn CSC, POB 3055, Victoria, BC V8W 3P6, Canada
[3] Univ New Brunswick, POB 4400,H-225 Head Hall,17 Dineen Dr, Fredericton, NB E3B 5A3, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Wave energy conversion; Model testing; Time domain; Power take-off; Self reacting; Point absorbers; Heave plate; Hydrodynamics; ABSORPTION; SIMULATION; MODELS;
D O I
10.1016/j.oceaneng.2019.01.034
中图分类号
U6 [水路运输]; P75 [海洋工程];
学科分类号
0814 ; 081505 ; 0824 ; 082401 ;
摘要
An experimental and numerical comparison of the performance of two self-reacting point absorber wave energy converter designs is undertaken for heave motions in irregular waves. The experiments consist of a series of 1:25 scale model tests that feature re-configurable WEC body shapes, a feedback controlled power take-off, and a heave motion constraint apparatus. While both designs have the same float, the first design features a streamlined reacting body and the second design features a damper plate reacting body. A time domain numerical model, validated by the experimental results, is used to extend the comparisons of the designs in terms of power matrices, capture width matrices, and mean annual power production. Results indicate that the wave energy converter design with damper plate produces 41% higher mean annual energy production than the wave energy converter design with streamlined reacting body at a representative location near the West Coast of Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada.
引用
收藏
页码:716 / 731
页数:16
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, OCEAN WAVES OSCILLAT, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511754630
[2]  
[Anonymous], THESIS
[3]   A database of capture width ratio of wave energy converters [J].
Babarit, A. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2015, 80 :610-628
[4]   Numerical benchmarking study of a selection of wave energy converters [J].
Babarit, A. ;
Hals, J. ;
Muliawan, M. J. ;
Kurniawan, A. ;
Moan, T. ;
Krokstad, J. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2012, 41 :44-63
[5]  
Babarit A., 2011, TECH REP
[6]  
Beatty S. J., 2009, P INT C OFFSH MECH A
[7]   Experimental and numerical comparisons of self-reacting point absorber wave energy converters in regular waves [J].
Beatty, Scott J. ;
Hall, Matthew ;
Buckham, Bradley J. ;
Wild, Peter ;
Bocking, Bryce .
OCEAN ENGINEERING, 2015, 104 :370-386
[8]  
Budal K., 1985, P 4 INT OFFSH MECH A
[9]   Wave energy resource characterisation of the Atlantic Marine Energy Test Site [J].
Cahill, B. G. ;
Lewis, T. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MARINE ENERGY, 2013, 1 (01) :3-15
[10]   Modelling, control and Pontryagin Maximum Principle for a two-body wave energy device [J].
Candido, Jose J. ;
Justino, Paulo A. P. S. .
RENEWABLE ENERGY, 2011, 36 (05) :1545-1557