Policy implementation of multi-modal (shared) mobility: review of a supply-demand value proposition canvas

被引:36
作者
Meng, Li [1 ]
Somenahalli, Sekhar [1 ]
Berry, Stephen [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, Mawson Lakes, Australia
关键词
Multi-modal shared mobility; business modal; smart operation systems; value proposition; government policy; MODE CHOICE; BUSINESS MODELS; DIFFUSION; SERVICES; INTERNET; CARPOOL; SAFETY; MEDIA;
D O I
10.1080/01441647.2020.1758237
中图分类号
U [交通运输];
学科分类号
08 ; 0823 ;
摘要
Urban mobility options have increased in recent years, assisted by the widespread availability of smart device software apps, geo-positioning technology, and convenient electronic financial transactions. Multi-modal shared mobility consists of public transit systems and shared mobilities that support first/last mile travel, denoting the capability of Mobility as a Service (MaaS), and to stimulate additional non-private car travel demand. This paper reviews the supply and demand sides of implementation of multi-modal shared mobility. It found that an abundance of shared modes of car, bike, and e-scooter that are linked to public transport, can improve transport accessibility to meet specific public preferences, reduce social inequality, and minimise dilemmas from the demand side. This study introduces government policy innovations and other supporting system to improve the implementation of multi-modal shared mobility. Government policies play a key role in supporting shared mobility and technology development. However, governments do not have much information about new products such as shared mobility, which creates difficulties in subsidising multi-modal shared mobility services and potentially leads to policy failures around shared mobility schemes. This study suggests that policy entrepreneurship in collaboration with other partners, policy innovation, and the notions of merit goods and second-best policymaking can enable policy initiatives towards multi-modal shared mobility and provide supporting arguments if policies encounter failures. Implementing multi-modal shared mobility requires a collaborative partnership for a paradigm shift: service providers and government must jointly set a merit-based business model, with the support of organisations to achieve improved infrastructure provision, and smart technology applications. The findings will assist the community, business providers and government policymakers to promote multi-modal shared mobility as a pathway towards more efficient, environmentally sustainable, and socially responsive mobility solutions.
引用
收藏
页码:670 / 684
页数:15
相关论文
共 69 条
  • [31] Kodransky M., 2014, CONNECTING LOW INCOM
  • [32] Do sharing people behave differently? An empirical evaluation of the distinctive mobility patterns of free-floating car-sharing members
    Kopp, Johanna
    Gerike, Regine
    Axhausen, Kay W.
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION, 2015, 42 (03) : 449 - 469
  • [33] Smart City Services over a Future Internet Platform Based on Internet of Things and Cloud: The Smart Parking Case
    Lanza, Jorge
    Sanchez, Luis
    Gutierrez, Veronica
    Antonio Galache, Jose
    Ramon Santana, Juan
    Sotres, Pablo
    Munoz, Luis
    [J]. ENERGIES, 2016, 9 (09)
  • [34] Measuring the impact of opening the London shared bicycle scheme to casual users
    Lathia, Neal
    Ahmed, Saniul
    Capra, Licia
    [J]. TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART C-EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES, 2012, 22 : 88 - 102
  • [35] Objects Communication Behavior on Multihomed Hybrid Ad Hoc Networks
    Leal, Bernardo
    Atzori, Luigi
    [J]. INTERNET OF THINGS-BOOK, 2010, : 3 - 11
  • [36] Lesh Matthew Curtis, 2013, Urban Public Transportation Systems 2013. Proceedings of the Third International Conference on Urban Public Transportation Systems, P63
  • [37] Litman T., 2017, AUTONOMOUS VEHICLE I
  • [38] Transport and social exclusion: Where are we now?
    Lucas, Karen
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2012, 20 : 107 - 115
  • [39] Majone G., 1988, The power of public ideas, V157, P158
  • [40] How do cities approach policy innovation and policy learning? A study of 30 policies in Northern Europe and North America
    Marsden, G.
    Frick, K. T.
    May, A. D.
    Deakin, E.
    [J]. TRANSPORT POLICY, 2011, 18 (03) : 501 - 512