Civil Society Organizations for and with the Courts and Judges-Struggle for the Rule of Law and Judicial Independence: The Case of Poland 1976-2020

During the rule of law backsliding crisis in Poland since late 2015, Civil Society Organizations (CSOs) have been active in the struggles to defend judicial independence. CSOs cooperate closely with judges and support their 'judicial resistance'. This Article has three main objectives: describe and analyze the relationship between judges and CSOs; show the evolution - both continuity and discontinuity in their relations over time; assess whether CSOs' activities are of any practical significance and therefore worth attention. The CSO-judicial relationship is analyzed for three periods: 1976-1989, the years before the transformation of Poland from a 'people's republic' to a democracy; 1989-2015, the time of building liberal democracy and the rule of law; 2015-2020, the time of defending the rule of law from a populist attack. Drawing on sources including years of participant observation providing unique and insider knowledge, the author analyzes the activities and outputs of CSOs and judges focusing on their interactions and cooperation. The author argues that CSOs play a significant role in the struggle for the rule of law and judicial independence. This Article demonstrates that CSOs' current engagement and input is not an extraordinary, ad hoc phenomenon, but rather one that arose from the previous interactions between the judiciary and civil society. The author argues that what we witness in Poland is an unprecedented phenomenon, both in the character of the relationship between judges and CSOs, and the scale and diversity of their cooperation. At the same time, the author claims that CSOs are underappreciated, including by academia, their work is taken for granted, and their role in the legal complex can be seen as a partly lost opportunity. If noticed, appreciated, and supported CSOs activities and their role could be more meaningful.