Performance of soil moisture sensors in gypsiferous and salt-affected soils

被引:9
作者
Salman, Adil K. [1 ]
Aldulaimy, Saad E. [2 ]
Mohammed, Huthaifa J. [2 ]
Abed, Yaareb M. [3 ]
机构
[1] Tech Univ Carolo Wilhelmina Braunschweig, Inst Geoecol, Braunschweig, Germany
[2] Univ Anbar, Coll Agr, Dept Soil & Water Resources Sci, Anbar, Iraq
[3] Minist Agr, Hort Off, Anbar, Iraq
关键词
Soil sensor; Moisture content; Irrigation management; Gypsiferous soil; Soil salinity; WATER-CONTENT SENSORS; STANDARDIZING CHARACTERIZATION; CALIBRATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2021.07.006
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
Accurate soil moisture measurements are key for optimising field irrigation and for the precise monitoring of water flow in soil profiles or large watersheds. In recent decades, various soil moisture sensors (SMSs) have been widely used, and several studies have been conducted to evaluate the performance of the SMS technologies under different soil and field conditions. The soluble salt content in soil can affect the sensitivity of SMSs because of their influence on soil permittivity. In this field study, we evaluated different types of SMSs in gypsiferous and salt-affected soils located at two agricultural sites in western Iraq. Two WaterScout capacitance sensors, SM100 and SMEC300, were evaluated in addition to the Watermark granular matrix sensor. Soil moisture measurements by the gravimetric method were compared with SMS readings. Bulk electrical conductivity (ECb) ranged be-tween 3.3-8.1 and 5.6-10.3 dS m-1 for sites 1 and 2 respectively, during the experiment. The results showed that site-specific calibration of the sensors significantly increased their accuracy. At Site 1, the RMSE values for the Watermark, SM100, and SMEC300 sensors changed from 3.48, 2.68, and 1.96 before calibration to 1.25, 0.91, and 0.90, respectively. For site 2, the RMSE values changed from 3.78, 3.09, and 2.34, to 1.37, 1.03, and 0.95, respec-tively. After the site-specific calibration, the capacitance sensors were sufficiently accurate for scientific measurements. The granular matrix sensors should only be used for field irrigation management if a high-accuracy level is not required and only after site-specific calibration. (C) 2021 IAgrE. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:200 / 209
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Laboratory Calibration and Performance Evaluation of Low-Cost Capacitive and Very Low-Cost Resistive Soil Moisture Sensors [J].
Adla, Soham ;
Rai, Neeraj Kumar ;
Karumanchi, Sri Harsha ;
Tripathi, Shivam ;
Disse, Markus ;
Pande, Saket .
SENSORS, 2020, 20 (02)
[2]  
Aldulaimy Saad Enad Harfoush, 2019, Agraarteadus, V30, P63, DOI 10.15159/jas.19.09
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1990, FAO Soils Bulletin, V62
[4]   Standardizing characterization of electromagnetic water content sensors: Part 2. Evaluation of seven sensing systems [J].
Blonquist, JM ;
Jones, SB ;
Robinson, DA .
VADOSE ZONE JOURNAL, 2005, 4 (04) :1059-1069
[5]   Contribution to a utilitarian classification of gypsiferous soil [J].
Boyadgiev, TG ;
Verheye, WH .
GEODERMA, 1996, 74 (3-4) :321-338
[6]   Precision of soil moisture sensor irrigation controllers under field conditions [J].
Cardenas-Lailhacar, B. ;
Dukes, M. D. .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 2010, 97 (05) :666-672
[7]   Effect of Temperature and Salinity on the Precision and Accuracy of Landscape Irrigation Soil Moisture Sensor Systems [J].
Cardenas-Lailhacar, Bernard ;
Dukes, Michael D. .
JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 2015, 141 (07)
[8]   Performance Assessment of Five Different Soil Moisture Sensors under Irrigated Field Conditions in Oklahoma [J].
Datta, Sumon ;
Taghvaeian, Saleh ;
Ochsner, Tyson E. ;
Moriasi, Daniel ;
Gowda, Prasanna ;
Steiner, Jean L. .
SENSORS, 2018, 18 (11)
[9]  
David A. K., 2011, International Journal of Physical Sciences, V6, P7139
[10]  
Evett S., 2008, IAEATCS30