Associations between sensitivity to punishment, sensitivity to reward, and gambling

被引:31
作者
Gaher, Raluca M. [1 ]
Hahn, Austin M. [1 ]
Shishido, Hanako [1 ]
Simons, Jeffrey S. [1 ]
Gaster, Sam [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ S Dakota, Vermillion, SD 57069 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Gambling; Sensitivity to reward; Sensitivity to punishment; COLLEGE-STUDENTS; SENSATION SEEKING; SUBSTANCE-ABUSE; MARIJUANA USE; SCREEN SOGS; ALCOHOL; QUESTIONNAIRE; IMPULSIVITY; PREVALENCE; REGRESSION;
D O I
10.1016/j.addbeh.2014.11.014
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
The majority of individuals gamble during their lifetime; however only a subset of these individuals develops problematic gambling. Gray's Reinforcement Sensitivity Theory may be relevant to understanding gambling problems. Differences in sensitivity to punishments and rewards can influence an individual's behavior and may be pertinent to the development of gambling problems. This study examined the functional associations between sensitivity to punishment (SP), sensitivity to reward (SR), and gambling problems in a sample of 2254 college students. Zero-inflated negative binomial regression was used to predict gambling problems as well as the absence of gambling problems. Gambling problems were hypothesized to be positively associated With SR and inversely associated with SP. In addition, SP was hypothesized to moderate the association between SR and gambling problems, attenuating the strength of the association. As hypothesized, SR was positively associated with gambling problems. However, SP did not moderate the relationship between SR and gambling problems. SP did, however, moderate the relationship between SR and the likelihood of never experiencing gambling problems. The results demonstrate that individual differences in SP and SR are functionally associated with gambling problems. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:180 / 184
页数:5
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], DIAGNOSTIC AND STATI
[2]   Individual differences in evaluative conditioning and reinforcement sensitivity affect bet-sizes during gambling [J].
Brunborg, Geir Scott ;
Johnsen, Bjorn Helge ;
Mentzoni, Rune Aune ;
Molde, Helge ;
Pallesen, Stale .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2011, 50 (05) :729-734
[3]   Decision-making during gambling: an integration of cognitive and psychobiological approaches [J].
Clark, Luke .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2010, 365 (1538) :319-330
[4]   The relations of trait anxiety, anxiety sensitivity, and sensation seeking to adolescents' motivations for alcohol, cigarette, and marijuana use [J].
Comeau, N ;
Stewart, SH ;
Loba, P .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2001, 26 (06) :803-825
[5]   Testing problems in J. A. Gray's personality theory: a commentary on Matthews and Gilliland (1999) [J].
Corr, PJ .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2001, 30 (02) :333-352
[6]   Comparisons between the South Oaks Gambling Screen and a DSM-IV-based interview in a community survey of problem gambling [J].
Cox, BJ ;
Enns, MW ;
Michaud, V .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHIATRIE, 2004, 49 (04) :258-264
[7]   The role of impulsivity in the development of substance use and eating disorders [J].
Dawe, S ;
Loxton, NJ .
NEUROSCIENCE AND BIOBEHAVIORAL REVIEWS, 2004, 28 (03) :343-351
[8]   You bet: How personality differences affect risk-taking preferences [J].
Demaree, Heath A. ;
DeDonno, Michael A. ;
Burns, Kevin J. ;
Everhart, D. Erik .
PERSONALITY AND INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES, 2008, 44 (07) :1484-1494
[9]   Dependent heroin use and associated risky behaviour: The role of rash impulsiveness and reward sensitivity [J].
Dissabandara, Lakal O. ;
Loxton, Natalie J. ;
Dias, Shavindra R. ;
Dodd, Peter R. ;
Daglish, Mark ;
Stadlin, Alfreda .
ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2014, 39 (01) :71-76
[10]   Reward/punishment sensitivities among internet addicts: Implications for their addictive behaviors [J].
Dong, Guangheng ;
Hu, Yanbo ;
Lin, Xiao .
PROGRESS IN NEURO-PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY & BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2013, 46 :139-145