An Emergency Decision Making Method Based on Prospect Theory for Different Emergency Situations

被引:36
作者
Zhang, Zi-Xin [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Liang [1 ,2 ]
Wang, Ying-Ming [1 ]
机构
[1] Fuzhou Univ, Decis Sci Inst, Fuzhou 350116, Fujian, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Jaen, Dept Comp Sci, Jaen 23071, Spain
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Emergency situations; Emergency decision making; Prospect theory; Psychological behavior; LOSS AVERSION; UNCERTAINTY; RISK; MANAGEMENT; UTILITY; CHOICE;
D O I
10.1007/s13753-018-0173-x
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
Emergency decision making (EDM) is an effective way to deal with emergency situations because of its prominent role in alleviating the losses of properties and lives caused by emergency events. It has drawn increasing attention from both governments and academia, and become an important research topic in recent years. Studies show that decision makers are usually guided by bounded rationality under risk and uncertainty conditions. Their psychological behavior plays an important role in the decision making process, and EDM problems are usually characterized by high risk and uncertainty. Thus, decision makers' psychological behavior has been considered in existing EDM approaches based on prospect theory. An emergency event might evolve into different situations due to its dynamic evolution, which is one of the distinctive features of emergency events. This important issue has been discussed in existing EDM approaches, in which different emergency situations are dealt with by devising different solutions. However, existing EDM approaches do not consider decision makers' psychological behavior together with the different emergency situations and the different solutions. Motivated by such limitation, this study proposed a novel approach based on prospect theory considering emergency situations, which considers not only decision makers' psychological behavior, but also different emergency situations in the EDM process. Two examples and related comparison are provided to illustrate the feasibility and validity of this approach.
引用
收藏
页码:407 / 420
页数:14
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   Loss aversion under prospect theory: A parameter-free measurement [J].
Abdellaoui, Mohammed ;
Bleichrodt, Han ;
Paraschiv, Corina .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2007, 53 (10) :1659-1674
[2]  
[Anonymous], ENV IMPACT ASSESSMEN
[3]  
[Anonymous], AMBIGUITY
[4]   DISAPPOINTMENT IN DECISION-MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY [J].
BELL, DE .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1985, 33 (01) :1-27
[5]   REGRET IN DECISION-MAKING UNDER UNCERTAINTY [J].
BELL, DE .
OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 1982, 30 (05) :961-981
[6]   Additive Utility in Prospect Theory [J].
Bleichrodt, Han ;
Schmidt, Ulrich ;
Zank, Horst .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2009, 55 (05) :863-873
[7]  
Camerer C., 1998, Experimental Economics, V1, P163
[8]  
Cosgrave J., 1996, Disaster Prevention and Management, V5, P28, DOI DOI 10.1108/09653569610127424
[9]   Portfolio insurance and prospect theory investors: Popularity and optimal design of capital protected financial products [J].
Dichtl, Hubert ;
Drobetz, Wolfgang .
JOURNAL OF BANKING & FINANCE, 2011, 35 (07) :1683-1697
[10]   Strategic weight manipulation in multiple attribute decision making [J].
Dong, Yucheng ;
Liu, Yating ;
Liang, Haiming ;
Chiclana, Francisco ;
Herrera-Viedma, Enrique .
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2018, 75 :154-164