The influence of humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization on range of motion in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

被引:112
作者
Werner, Birgit S. [1 ,2 ]
Chaoui, Jean [3 ]
Walch, Gilles [2 ]
机构
[1] Clin Shoulder & Elbow Surg, Salzburger Leite 1, D-97616 Bad Neustadt an der Saale, Germany
[2] Hop Jean Mermoz, Ctr Orthoped Santy, Lyon, France
[3] Imascap, Brest, France
关键词
Reverse shoulder arthroplasty; range of motion; onlay design; humeral inclination; impingement; preoperative planning; PROSTHESIS; DESIGN; IMPINGEMENT; CUFF; ADDUCTION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jse.2017.03.032
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Recent developments in reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) have focused on changes in several design-related parameters, including humeral component design, to allow for easier convertibility. Alterations in humeral inclination and offset on shoulder kinematics may have a relevant influence on postoperative outcome. This study used a virtual computer simulation to evaluate the influence of humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization on range of motion in onlay design RSA. Methods: Three-dimensional RSA computer templating was created from computed tomography (CT) scans in 20 patients undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty for concentric osteoarthritis (Walch A1). Two concurrent factors were tested for impingement-free range of motion: humeral inclination (135 degrees vs. 145 degrees) and glenoid lateralization (0 mm vs. 5 mm). Results: Decreasing the humeral neck shaft angle demonstrated a significant increase in impingementfree range of motion. Compared to the 145 degrees configuration, extension was increased by 42.3 degrees (-8.5 degrees to 73.5 degrees), adduction by 15 degrees (10 degrees to 23 degrees), and external rotation with the arm at side by 15.1 degrees (8.5 degrees to 26.5 degrees); however, abduction was decreased by 6.5 degrees (-1 degrees to 12.5 degrees). Glenoid lateralization led to comparable results, but an additional increase in abduction of 7.6 degrees (-1 degrees to 16.5 degrees) and forward flexion of 26.6 degrees (6.5 degrees to 62 degrees) was observed. Conclusion: Lower humeral neck shaft angle and glenoid lateralization are effective for improvement in range of motion after RSA. The use of the 135 degrees model with 5 mm of glenoid lateralization provided the best results in impingement-free range of motion, except for abduction.
引用
收藏
页码:1726 / 1731
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[11]   Scapular Notching on Kinematic Simulated Range of Motion After Reverse Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Not the Result of Impingement in Adduction [J].
Laedermann, Alexandre ;
Gueorguiev, Boyko ;
Charbonnier, Caecilia ;
Stimec, Bojan V. ;
Fasel, Jean H. D. ;
Zderic, Ivan ;
Hagen, Jennifer ;
Walch, Gilles .
MEDICINE, 2015, 94 (38)
[12]   The effect of glenosphere diameter in reverse shoulder arthroplasty on muscle force, joint load, and range of motion [J].
Langohr, G. Daniel G. ;
Giles, Joshua W. ;
Athwal, George S. ;
Johnson, James A. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 24 (06) :972-979
[13]   Scapular notching in reverse shoulder arthroplasty [J].
Levigne, Christophe ;
Boileau, Pascal ;
Favard, Luc ;
Garaud, Pascal ;
Mole, Daniel ;
Sirveaux, Francois ;
Walch, Gilles .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2008, 17 (06) :925-935
[14]   An evaluation of the radiological changes around the Grammont reverse geometry shoulder arthroplasty after eight to 12 years [J].
Melis, B. ;
DeFranco, M. ;
Laedermann, A. ;
Mole, D. ;
Favard, L. ;
Nerot, C. ;
Maynou, C. ;
Walch, G. .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2011, 93B (09) :1240-1246
[15]   Three-dimensional measurement method of arthritic glenoid cavity morphology: Feasibility and reproducibility [J].
Moineau, G. ;
Levigne, C. ;
Boileau, P. ;
Young, A. ;
Walch, G. .
ORTHOPAEDICS & TRAUMATOLOGY-SURGERY & RESEARCH, 2012, 98 (06) :S139-S145
[16]   Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis [J].
Nyffeler, RW ;
Werner, CML ;
Gerber, C .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2005, 14 (05) :524-528
[17]   An evaluation of the relationships between reverse shoulder design parameters and range of motion, impingement, and stability [J].
Roche, Chris ;
Flurin, Pierre-Henri ;
Wright, Thomas ;
Crosby, Lynn A. ;
Mauldin, Michael ;
Zuckerman, Joseph D. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2009, 18 (05) :734-741
[18]   Grammont inverted total shoulder arthroplasty in the treatment of glenohumeral osteoarthritis with massive rupture of the cuff -: Results of a multicentre study of 80 shoulders [J].
Sirveaux, F ;
Favard, L ;
Oudet, D ;
Huquet, D ;
Walch, G ;
Molé, D .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 2004, 86B (03) :388-395
[19]   Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a biomechanical evaluation of humeral and glenosphere hardware configuration [J].
Tashjian, Robert Z. ;
Burks, Robert T. ;
Zhang, Yue ;
Henninger, Heath B. .
JOURNAL OF SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY, 2015, 24 (03) :E68-E77
[20]   Do Less Medialized Reverse Shoulder Prostheses Increase Motion and Reduce Notching? [J].
Valenti, Philippe ;
Sauzieres, Philippe ;
Katz, Denis ;
Kalouche, Ibrahim ;
Kilinc, Alexandre Sahin .
CLINICAL ORTHOPAEDICS AND RELATED RESEARCH, 2011, 469 (09) :2550-2557