How fictional works are related to fictional entities

被引:7
作者
Voltolini, A [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ E Piedmont, Vercelli, Italy
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1746-8361.2003.tb00267.x
中图分类号
B [哲学、宗教];
学科分类号
01 ; 0101 ;
摘要
The paper attempts at yielding a language-independent argument in favour of fictional entities, that is, an argument providing genuinely ontological reasons in favour of such entities. According to this argument, ficta are indispensable insofar as they are involved in the identity conditions of semantically-based entities we ordinarily accept, i.e. fictional works. It will also be evaluated to what extent this argument is close to other arguments recently provided to the same purpose.
引用
收藏
页码:225 / 238
页数:14
相关论文
共 23 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1990, NATURE FICTION
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1990, ARIST SOC P
  • [3] BONOMI A, 2003, SELECTED PAPERS 2ND
  • [4] CASTANEDA HN, 1989, THINKING LANGUAGE EX, P176
  • [5] FICTIONAL NAMES
    CURRIE, G
    [J]. AUSTRALASIAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY, 1988, 66 (04) : 471 - 488
  • [6] Evans Gareth., 1982, The Varieties of Reference
  • [7] GOODMAN N, 1988, RECONCEPTIONS PHILOS, P49
  • [8] Iacona A, 2002, DIALECTICA, V56, P284
  • [9] LEWIS D, 1978, AM PHILOS QUART, V15, P37
  • [10] Parsons T., 1980, Nonexistent Objects