A glimpsing account for the benefit of simulated combined acoustic and electric hearing

被引:61
作者
Li, Ning [1 ]
Loizou, Philipos C. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Texas Dallas, Dept Elect Engn, Richardson, TX 75083 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1121/1.2839013
中图分类号
O42 [声学];
学科分类号
070206 ; 082403 ;
摘要
The benefits of combined electric and acoustic stimulation (EAS) in terms of speech recognition in noise are well established; however the underlying factors responsible for this benefit are not clear. The present study tests the hypothesis that having access to acoustic information in the low frequencies makes it easier for listeners to glimpse the target. Normal-hearing listeners were presented with vocoded speech alone (V), low-pass (LP) filtered speech alone, combined vocoded and LP speech (LP+V) and with vocoded stimuli constructed so that the low-frequency envelopes were easier to glimpse. Target speech was mixed with two types of maskers (steady-state noise and competing talker) at -5 to 5 dB signal-to-noise ratios. Results indicated no advantage of LP+V in steady noise, but a significant advantage over V in the competing talker background, an outcome consistent with the notion that it is easier for listeners to glimpse the target in fluctuating maskers. A significant improvement in performance was noted with the modified glimpsed stimuli over the original vocoded stimuli. These findings taken together suggest that a significant factor contributing to the EAS advantage is the enhanced ability to glimpse the target. (C) 2008 Acoustical Society of America.
引用
收藏
页码:2287 / 2294
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
Albert S. Bregman, 1990, AUDITORY SCENE ANAL, P411, DOI [DOI 10.7551/MITPRESS/1486.001.0001, 10.1121/1.408434, DOI 10.1121/1.408434]
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1969, IEEE T ACOUST SPEECH, VAU17, P225
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, SPEECH PROCESSING AU, DOI DOI 10.1007/0-387-21575-1_5
[4]  
ANSI, 1997, S351997 ANSIASA
[5]   Determination of the potential benefit of time-frequency gain manipulation [J].
Anzalone, Michael C. ;
Calandruccio, Lauren ;
Doherty, Karen A. ;
Carney, Laurel H. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2006, 27 (05) :480-492
[6]   INTONATION AND THE PERCEPTUAL SEPARATION OF SIMULTANEOUS VOICES [J].
BROKX, JPL ;
NOOTEBOOM, SG .
JOURNAL OF PHONETICS, 1982, 10 (01) :23-36
[7]   AN INTERNATIONAL COMPARISON OF LONG-TERM AVERAGE SPEECH SPECTRA [J].
BYRNE, D ;
DILLON, H ;
TRAN, K ;
ARLINGER, S ;
WILBRAHAM, K ;
COX, R ;
HAGERMAN, B ;
HETU, R ;
KEI, J ;
LUI, C ;
KIESSLING, J ;
KOTBY, MN ;
NASSER, NHA ;
ELKHOLY, WAH ;
NAKANISHI, Y ;
OYER, H ;
POWELL, R ;
STEPHENS, D ;
MEREDITH, R ;
SIRIMANNA, T ;
TAVARTKILADZE, G ;
FROLENKOV, GI ;
WESTERMAN, S ;
LUDVIGSEN, C .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1994, 96 (04) :2108-2120
[8]   Unintelligible low-frequency sound enhances simulated cochlear-implant speech recognition in noise [J].
Chang, Janice E. ;
Bai, John Y. ;
Zeng, Fan-Gang .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2006, 53 (12) :2598-2601
[9]   A glimpsing model of speech perception in noise [J].
Cooke, M .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 2006, 119 (03) :1562-1573
[10]   Making sense of everyday speech: a glimpsing account [J].
Cooke, M .
SPEECH SEPARATION BY HUMANS AND MACHINES, 2005, :305-314