A Nordic survey of CT doses in hybrid PET/CT and SPECT/CT examinations

被引:28
作者
Bebbington, Natalie A. [1 ]
Haddock, Bryan T. [2 ]
Bertilsson, Henrik [3 ]
Hippelainen, Eero [4 ,5 ]
Husby, Ellen M. [6 ]
Tunninen, Virpi, I [7 ]
Soderberg, Marcus [8 ,9 ]
机构
[1] Siemens Healthcare AS, Bredskifte Alle 15, DK-8210 Aarhus, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Clin Physiol, Nucl Med & PET, Rigshosp, Ndr Ringvej 57, DK-2600 Glostrup, Denmark
[3] Siemens Healthcare AB, Evenemangsgatan 21, S-16979 Solna, Sweden
[4] Univ Helsinki, Meilahti Hosp, HUS Med Imaging Ctr, Clin Physiol & Nucl Med,Nucl Med Unit, Tukholmankatu 8,PL 442, Hus Helsinki 00029, Finland
[5] Helsinki Univ Hosp, Tukholmankatu 8,PL 442, Hus Helsinki 00029, Finland
[6] Oslo Univ Hosp, Gaustad Hosp, Dept Diagnost Phys, Bldg 20,POB 4959, N-0424 Oslo, Norway
[7] Satakunta Cent Hosp, Dept Nucl Med, Sairaalantie 3, Pori 28500, Finland
[8] Lund Univ, Dept Translat Med, Med Radiat Phys, Inga Marie Nilssons Gata 49, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
[9] Skane Univ Hosp, Dept Hematol Oncol & Radiat Phys, Radiat Phys, Inga Marie Nilssons Gata 49, S-20502 Malmo, Sweden
关键词
Computed tomography; Diagnostic reference levels; Dosimetry; Hybrid imaging; PET; CT; SPECT; DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS; NATIONAL-SURVEY;
D O I
10.1186/s40658-019-0266-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Background Computed tomography (CT) scans are routinely performed in positron emission tomography (PET) and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) examinations globally, yet few surveys have been conducted to gather national diagnostic reference level (NDRL) data for CT radiation doses in positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and single photon emission computed tomography/computed tomography (SPECT/CT). In this first Nordic-wide study of CT doses in hybrid imaging, Nordic NDRL CT doses are suggested for PET/CT and SPECT/CT examinations specific to the clinical purpose of CT, and the scope for optimisation is evaluated. Data on hybrid imaging CT exposures and clinical purpose of CT were gathered for 5 PET/CT and 8 SPECT/CT examinations via designed booklet. For each included dataset for a given facility and scanner type, the computed tomography dose index by volume (CTDIvol) and dose length product (DLP) was interpolated for a 75-kg person (referred to as CTDIvol,75kg and DLP75kg). Suggested NDRL (75th percentile) and achievable doses (50th percentile) were determined for CTDIvol,75kg and DLP75kg according to clinical purpose of CT. Differences in maximum and minimum doses (derived for a 75-kg patient) between facilities were also calculated for each examination and clinical purpose. Results Data were processed from 83 scanners from 43 facilities. Data were sufficient to suggest Nordic NDRL CT doses for the following: PET/CT oncology (localisation/characterisation, 15 systems); infection/inflammation (localisation/characterisation, 13 systems); brain (attenuation correction (AC) only, 11 systems); cardiac PET/CT and SPECT/CT (AC only, 30 systems); SPECT/CT lung (localisation/characterisation, 12 systems); bone (localisation/characterisation, 30 systems); and parathyroid (localisation/characterisation, 13 systems). Great variations in dose were seen for all aforementioned examinations. Greatest differences in DLP75kg for each examination, specific to clinical purpose, were as follows: SPECT/CT lung AC only (27.4); PET/CT and SPECT/CT cardiac AC only (19.6); infection/inflammation AC only (18.1); PET/CT brain localisation/characterisation (16.8); SPECT/CT bone localisation/characterisation (10.0); PET/CT oncology AC only (9.0); and SPECT/CT parathyroid localisation/characterisation (7.8). Conclusions Suggested Nordic NDRL CT doses are presented according to clinical purpose of CT for PET/CT oncology, infection/inflammation, brain, PET/CT and SPECT/CT cardiac, and SPECT/CT lung, bone, and parathyroid. The large variation in doses suggests great scope for optimisation in all 8 examinations.
引用
收藏
页数:16
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
ALESSIO A, 2015, J NUCL MED S3, V56
[2]   Role of Reference Levels in Nuclear Medicine: A Report of the SNMMI Dose Optimization Task Force [J].
Alessio, Adam M. ;
Farrell, Mary Beth ;
Fahey, Frederic H. .
JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE, 2015, 56 (12) :1960-1964
[3]   Diagnostic reference levels for 18F-FDG whole body PET/CT procedures: Results from a survey of 12 centres in Australia and New Zealand [J].
Alkhybari, Essam M. ;
McEntee, Mark F. ;
Brennan, Patrick C. ;
Willowson, Kathy P. ;
Kench, Peter L. .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL IMAGING AND RADIATION ONCOLOGY, 2019, 63 (03) :291-299
[4]   DETERMINING AND UPDATING PET/CT AND SPECT/CT DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW [J].
Alkhybari, Essam M. ;
McEntee, Mark F. ;
Brennan, Patrick C. ;
Willowson, Kathy P. ;
Hogg, Peter ;
Kench, Peter L. .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2018, 182 (04) :532-545
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1997, OFF J EUR COMMUN, pL180
[6]   PATIENT DOSES FROM HYBRID SPECT-CT PROCEDURES [J].
Avramova-Cholakova, S. ;
Dimcheva, M. ;
Petrova, E. ;
Garcheva, M. ;
Dimitrova, M. ;
Palashev, Y. ;
Vassileva, J. .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2015, 165 (1-4) :424-429
[7]   PATIENT DOSES FROM PET-CT PROCEDURES [J].
Avramova-Cholakova, S. ;
Ivanova, S. ;
Petrova, E. ;
Garcheva, M. ;
Vassileva, J. .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2015, 165 (1-4) :430-433
[8]   Dynamic CT for Parathyroid Adenoma Detection: How Does Radiation Dose Compare With Nuclear Medicine? [J].
Czarnecki, Caroline A. ;
Einsiedel, Paul F. ;
Phal, Pramit M. ;
Miller, Julie A. ;
Lichtenstein, Meir ;
Stella, Damien L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2018, 210 (05) :1118-1122
[9]  
Dickson J, 2016, SCOPE, V25, P10
[10]   National survey of patient doses from whole-body FDG PET-CT examinations in France in 2011 [J].
Etard, Cecile ;
Celier, David ;
Roch, Patrice ;
Aubert, Bernard .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2012, 152 (04) :334-338