Techno-economic study of CO2 capture from an existing coal-fired power plant:: MEA scrubbing vs. O2/CO2 recycle combustion

被引:452
作者
Singh, D
Croiset, E
Douglas, PL
Douglas, MA
机构
[1] Univ Waterloo, Dept Chem Engn, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
[2] Nat Resources Canada, CANMET Energy Technol Ctr, Nepean, ON K1A 1M1, Canada
关键词
CO2; capture; MEA; O-2/CO2; recycle; Aspen plus; economics;
D O I
10.1016/S0196-8904(03)00040-2
中图分类号
O414.1 [热力学];
学科分类号
摘要
The existing fleet of modern pulverised coal fired power plants represents an opportunity to achieve significant reductions in greenhouse gas emissions in the coming years providing that efficient and economical CO2 capture technologies are available for retrofit. One option is to separate CO2 from the products of combustion using conventional approaches such as amine scrubbing. An emerging alternative, commonly known as O-2/CO2 recycle combustion, involves burning the coal with oxygen in an atmosphere of recycled flue gas. Both approaches can be retrofitted to existing units, however they consume significant amounts of energy to capture, purify and compress the CO2 for subsequent sequestration. This paper presents a techno-economic comparison of the performance of the two approaches. The comparison was developed using the commercial process simulation packages, Hysys & Aspen Plus. The results show that both processes are expensive options to capture CO2 from coal power plants, however O-2/ CO, appears to be a more attractive retrofit than MEA scrubbing. The CO2 capture cost for the MEA case is USD 53/ton of CO2 avoided, which translates into 3.3 phi/kW h. For the O-2/CO2 case the CO2 capture cost is lower at USD 35/ton of CO2 avoided, which translates into 2.4 phi/kW h. These capture costs represent an approximate increase of 20-30% in current electricity prices. (C) 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3073 / 3091
页数:19
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
*ASP TECHN LTD, 2001, IC PROC EV IC PROC E
[2]  
*ASP TECHN LTD, 2000, ASP PLUS US GUID
[3]  
Chakma A., 1997, ENERGY CONVERS MGMT, V38, P51
[4]  
CHAKMA A, 1999, P COMB CAN 99 CALG C
[5]  
CROISET F, 1999, P COMB CAN 99 CALG C
[6]   Performance modelling of a carbon dioxide removal system for power plants [J].
Desideri, U ;
Paolucci, A .
ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT, 1999, 40 (18) :1899-1915
[7]  
Hendriks C., 2012, CARBON DIOXIDE REMOV, P233
[8]  
HERZOG H, 2000, P 5 C GREENH GAS CON
[9]  
*HYS, 2000, HYS PLANT US MAN
[10]  
Mariz CL, 1998, J CAN PETROL TECHNOL, V37, P42