Topical ethyl chloride to reduce pain associated with venous catheterization: a randomized crossover trial

被引:11
作者
Fossum, Kurt [1 ]
Love, Sue L. [1 ]
April, Michael D. [1 ]
机构
[1] San Antonio Uniformed Serv Hlth Educ Consortium, Dept Emergency Med, 3551 Roger Brooke Dr, Joint Base San Antonio, TX USA
关键词
VAPOCOOLANT SPRAY; INTRAVENOUS CANNULATION; EMERGENCY-DEPARTMENT; VENIPUNCTURE; DIFFERENCE; LIGNOCAINE; ANALGESIA; LIDOCAINE; SCALE; CREAM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajem.2016.01.039
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: To compare pain associated with venous catheterization after administration of topical ethyl chloride vs placebo among emergency department health care providers. Methods: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial among a convenience sample of health care provider volunteers in a tertiary care urban emergency department. We randomly allocated subjects to initial treatment (ethyl chloride vs sterile water aerosol spray) and catheterization site (left or right antecubital fossa). After venous catheterization placement and discontinuation, subjects underwent a 5-minute washout period. All subjects then underwent venous catheterization in the contralateral antecubital fossa after administration of the alternative agent. We measured all outcomes after discontinuation of the second catheter. The primary outcome was difference in pain verbal numeric rating scale score (0-10) between the 2 agents. Secondary outcomes included preferred agent (binary) and future willingness to use agent on patients (5-point Likert scale). Results: Thirty-eight health care providers were recruited; all completed the study. Median pain verbal numeric rating scale scores were 4 (interquartile range, 2-5) for placebo vs 2 (1-4) for ethyl chloride. The effect size for pain reduction with ethyl chloride compared with placebo was 2 (95% confidence interval, 0.5-2; P = .001). Most subjects (68.4%) preferred ethyl chloride to placebo. Five-point Likert scale scores measuring willingness to use preferred product on future patients were higher by 2 (95% confidence interval, 1-3) among subjects preferring ethyl chloride vs placebo. Conclusions: We found that topical ethyl chloride yields a greater reduction in pain associated with venous catheterization compared with topical placebo. Published by Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:845 / 850
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   ETHYL CHLORIDE AND VENIPUNCTURE PAIN - A COMPARISON WITH INTRADERMAL LIDOCAINE [J].
ARMSTRONG, P ;
YOUNG, C ;
MCKEOWN, D .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1990, 37 (06) :656-658
[2]   THERAPEUTIC USE OF COLD [J].
BIERMAN, W .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1955, 157 (14) :1189-1192
[3]  
Bijur PE, 2003, ACAD EMERG MED, V10, P390, DOI 10.1197/aemj.10.4.390
[4]  
Biro P, 1997, Eur J Pain, V1, P37, DOI 10.1016/S1090-3801(97)90051-3
[5]   Vapocoolant Spray vs Lidocaine/Prilocaine Cream for Reducing the Pain of Venipuncture in Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Crossover Study [J].
Celik, Gulperi ;
Ozbek, Orhan ;
Yilmaz, Mumtaz ;
Duman, Ipek ;
Ozbek, Seda ;
Apiliogullari, Seza .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2011, 8 (07) :623-627
[6]   Prevalence and source of pain in pediatric inpatients [J].
Cummings, EA ;
Reid, GJ ;
Finley, GA ;
McGrath, PJ ;
Ritchie, JA .
PAIN, 1996, 68 (01) :25-31
[7]   PAIN-FREE VENIPUNCTURE - EFFECT OF TIMING OF APPLICATION OF LOCAL-ANESTHETIC CREAM [J].
HALLEN, B ;
OLSSON, GL ;
UPPFELDT, A .
ANAESTHESIA, 1984, 39 (10) :969-972
[8]   Mitigation of pain during intravenous catheter placement using a topical skin coolant in the emergency department [J].
Hartstein, B. H. ;
Barry, J. D. .
EMERGENCY MEDICINE JOURNAL, 2008, 25 (05) :257-261
[9]   Effect of topical alkane vapocoolant spray on pain with intravenous cannulation in patients in emergency departments: randomised double blind placebo controlled trial [J].
Hijazi, Ramzi ;
Taylor, David ;
Richardson, Joanna .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2009, 338 :457-459
[10]   Does the clinically significant difference in visual analog scale pain scores vary with gender, age, or cause of pain? [J].
Kelly, AM .
ACADEMIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE, 1998, 5 (11) :1086-1090