Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulator with controllable pulse parameters

被引:61
作者
Peterchev, Angel V. [1 ,2 ,3 ,4 ]
Murphy, David L. [1 ,4 ]
Lisanby, Sarah H. [1 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Duke Univ, Dept Psychiat & Behav Sci, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Dept Biomed Engn, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Dept Elect & Comp Engn, Durham, NC 27706 USA
[4] Columbia Univ, NY State Psychiat Inst, Dept Psychiat, Div Brain Stimulat & Therapeut Modulat, New York, NY USA
关键词
MAJOR DEPRESSION; SAFETY; RTMS; EFFICACY; CIRCUIT; SINGLE; COIL;
D O I
10.1088/1741-2560/8/3/036016
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
The characteristics of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pulses influence the physiological effect of TMS. However, available TMS devices allow very limited adjustment of the pulse parameters. We describe a novel TMS device that uses a circuit topology incorporating two energy storage capacitors and two insulated-gate bipolar transistor (IGBT) modules to generate near-rectangular electric field pulses with adjustable number, polarity, duration, and amplitude of the pulse phases. This controllable pulse parameter TMS (cTMS) device can induce electric field pulses with phase widths of 10-310 mu s and positive/negative phase amplitude ratio of 1-56. Compared to conventional monophasic and biphasic TMS, cTMS reduces energy dissipation up to 82% and 57% and decreases coil heating up to 33% and 41%, respectively. We demonstrate repetitive TMS trains of 3000 pulses at frequencies up to 50 Hz with electric field pulse amplitude and width variability less than the measurement resolution (1.7% and 1%, respectively). Offering flexible pulse parameter adjustment and reduced power consumption and coil heating, cTMS enhances existing TMS paradigms, enables novel research applications and could lead to clinical applications with potentially enhanced potency.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
AGNEW WF, 1987, NEUROSURGERY, V20, P143
[2]   Pulse configuration-dependent effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on visual perception [J].
Antal, A ;
Kincses, TZ ;
Nitsche, MA ;
Bartfai, O ;
Demmer, I ;
Sommer, M ;
Paulus, W .
NEUROREPORT, 2002, 13 (17) :2229-2233
[3]   Comparison between short train, monophasic and biphasic repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) of the human motor cortex [J].
Arai, N ;
Okabe, S ;
Furubayashi, T ;
Terao, Y ;
Yuasa, K ;
Ugawa, Y .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2005, 116 (03) :605-613
[4]   Differences in after-effect between monophasic and biphasic high-frequency rTMS of the human motor cortex [J].
Arai, Noritoshi ;
Okabe, Shingo ;
Furubayashi, Toshiaki ;
Mochizuki, Hitoshi ;
Iwata, Nobue K. ;
Hanajima, Ritsuko ;
Terao, Yasuo ;
Ugawa, Yoshikazu .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2007, 118 (10) :2227-2233
[5]  
BARKER AT, 1991, ELECTROEN CLIN NEURO, P227
[6]   Circuit and Coil Design for In-Vitro Magnetic Neural Stimulation Systems [J].
Basham, Eric ;
Yang, Zhi ;
Liu, Wentai .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL CIRCUITS AND SYSTEMS, 2009, 3 (05) :321-331
[7]   Magnetic stimulation coil and circuit design [J].
Davey, K ;
Epstein, CM .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 2000, 47 (11) :1493-1499
[8]   Iron-core coils for transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Epstein, CM ;
Davey, KR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 19 (04) :376-381
[9]   LOCALIZING THE SITE OF MAGNETIC BRAIN-STIMULATION IN HUMANS [J].
EPSTEIN, CM ;
SCHWARTZBERG, DG ;
DAVEY, KR ;
SUDDERTH, DB .
NEUROLOGY, 1990, 40 (04) :666-670
[10]   HISTORY OF MAGNETIC STIMULATION OF THE NERVOUS-SYSTEM [J].
GEDDES, LA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1991, 8 (01) :3-9