Formulation of Shannon entropy model averaging for groundwater level prediction using artificial intelligence models

被引:12
作者
Razzagh, S. [1 ]
Sadeghfam, S. [2 ]
Nadiri, A. A. [1 ,3 ,4 ,7 ]
Busico, G. [5 ,6 ]
Ntona, M. M. [5 ]
Kazakis, N. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tabriz, Fac Nat Sci, Dept Earth Sci, 29 Bahman Blvd, Tabriz, East Azerbaijan, Iran
[2] Univ Maragheh, Fac Engn, Dept Civil Engn, POB 55136-553, Maragheh, East Azerbaijan, Iran
[3] Univ Tabriz, Inst Environm, Tabriz, East Azerbaijan, Iran
[4] Ardabil Univ Med Sci, Tradit Med & Hydrotherapy Res Ctr, Ardebil, Iran
[5] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Geol, Lab Engn Geol & Hydrogeol, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece
[6] Univ Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Dept Environm Biol & Pharmaceut Sci & Technol, Caserta, Italy
[7] Univ Tabriz, Med Geol & Environm Res Ctr, Tabriz, Iran
关键词
Shannon entropy; ANN; SL; NF; Groundwater level; Two-level modeling; Lake Urmia; NEURAL-NETWORK APPROACH; FUZZY; RISK; FLUCTUATIONS; ENSEMBLE; STRATEGY; AQUIFER; SYSTEM; ANN;
D O I
10.1007/s13762-021-03793-2
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A two-level modeling strategy is formulated to predict groundwater levels (GWL) within a portion of Lake Urmia's aquifer in NW Iran during 14 years (2001-2015), which both aquifer and lake suffer significant water decline. At Level 1, three artificial intelligence (AI) models were trained and tested, which comprise artificial neural network (ANN), Sugeno fuzzy logic (SFL), and neuro-fuzzy (NF). At Level 2, a novel formulation was employed, referred to as the Shannon entropy model averaging (EMA). This formulation combines the results at Level 1 by calculating the weights of Level 1 models based on an innovative approach, which incorporates performance, stability, and parsimony criteria. The results indicate that the models at Level 1 are fit-for-purpose and can capture the water table decline in GWL, but EMA improves RMSE by 5% in the testing phase. Although EMA does not significantly increase the performance of the models, the results of the homoscedastic test in models' residuals indicate that EMA increases the reliability of prediction owing to the homoscedastic residuals with the highest p value compared to Level 1 models. The p values as per Breusch-Pagan and White tests are 0.88 and 1, respectively, which indicates further information does not remain in the EMA residual. The EMA formulation can be applied to other water resource management problems.
引用
收藏
页码:6203 / 6220
页数:18
相关论文
共 74 条
[1]  
Aeschbach-Hertig W, 2012, NAT GEOSCI, V5, P853, DOI [10.1038/NGEO1617, 10.1038/ngeo1617]
[2]   Soil Moisture Profile Development from Surface Observations by Principle of Maximum Entropy [J].
Al-Hamdan, O. Z. ;
Cruise, J. F. .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2010, 15 (05) :327-337
[3]   Water level forecasting through fuzzy logic and artificial neural network approaches [J].
Alvisi, S ;
Mascellani, G ;
Franchini, M ;
Bárdossy, A .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2006, 10 (01) :1-17
[4]   Enhancement of Groundwater-Level Prediction Using an Integrated Machine Learning Model Optimized by Whale Algorithm [J].
Banadkooki, Fatemeh Barzegari ;
Ehteram, Mohammad ;
Ahmed, Ali Najah ;
Teo, Fang Yenn ;
Fai, Chow Ming ;
Afan, Haitham Abdulmohsin ;
Sapitang, Michelle ;
El-Shafie, Ahmed .
NATURAL RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2020, 29 (05) :3233-3252
[5]   Mapping groundwater contamination risk of multiple aquifers using multi-model ensemble of machine learning algorithms [J].
Barzegar, Rahim ;
Moghaddam, Asghar Asghari ;
Deo, Ravinesh ;
Fijani, Elham ;
Tziritis, Evangelos .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2018, 621 :697-712
[6]   Forecasting of groundwater level fluctuations using ensemble hybrid multi-wavelet neural network-based models [J].
Barzegar, Rahim ;
Fijani, Elham ;
Moghaddam, Asghar Asghari ;
Tziritis, Evangelos .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 599 :20-31
[7]   Hybrid computational intelligence models for groundwater potential mapping [J].
Binh Thai Pham ;
Jaafari, Abolfazl ;
Prakash, Indra ;
Singh, Sushant K. ;
Nguyen Kim Quoc ;
Dieu Tien Bui .
CATENA, 2019, 182
[8]   Fuzzy clustering analysis for optimizing fuzzy membership functions [J].
Chen, MS ;
Wang, SW .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1999, 103 (02) :239-254
[9]   ENTROPY AND PROBABILITY CONCEPTS IN HYDRAULICS [J].
CHIU, CL .
JOURNAL OF HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING-ASCE, 1987, 113 (05) :583-600
[10]  
Chiu SL., 1994, J INTELL FUZZY SYST, V2, P267, DOI [10.3233/IFS-1994-2306, DOI 10.3233/IFS-1994-2306]