Portal dosimetry for pretreatment verification of IMRT plan: a comparison with 2D ion chamber array

被引:27
作者
Sharma, Dayananda Shamurailatpam [1 ]
Mhatre, Vaibav [1 ]
Heigrujam, Malhotra [1 ]
Talapatra, Kaustav [1 ]
Mallik, Suman [1 ]
机构
[1] Kokilaben Dhirubhai Ambani Hosp & Med Res Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Bombay 400053, Maharashtra, India
来源
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS | 2010年 / 11卷 / 04期
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
portal dosimetry; IMRT; 2D detector array; gamma; QA; MODULATED RADIATION-THERAPY; PIXEL IONIZATION-CHAMBER; IMAGING DEVICE; QUANTITATIVE-EVALUATION; CLINICAL-EXPERIENCE; DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS; FILM DOSIMETRY; ROUTINE; FIELDS;
D O I
10.1120/jacmp.v11i4.3268
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Portal dosimetry (PD) was performed for 181 fields from 14 IMRT plans of various clinical sites at gantry zero and source-to-detector distance (SDD) of 100 cm. PD was realized using aSi1000 electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and portal dose prediction (PDP) algorithm implemented in Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS). Agreement of PDP predicted and EPID measured photon fluence/dose distribution were evaluated using gamma (gamma) index set at 3% at 3 mm distance to point agreement (DTA). Three gamma scaling parameters, maximum gamma(gamma(max)), average gamma(gamma(avg)) and percentage of points with gamma <= 1 (gamma(%) <= 1) were estimated for each field. An independent measurement was carried out using MatriXX 2D ion chamber array with detector plane at 100 cm and gamma(max), gamma(avg) and gamma(%) <= 1 were estimated using OmniPro IMRT analyzing software. Effect of extended SDD and gantry rotation on portal dosimetry outcome was also investigated for another 45 IMRT fields. PDP predicted and EPID measured photon fluence agrees well with overall mean values of gamma(max), gamma(avg) and gamma(%) <= 1 at 2.02, 0.24 and 99.43%, respectively. max value was lower in 15 MV compared to 6 MV IMRT plan. Independent verification using MatriXX showed comparable overall mean values of gamma(avg) and gamma(%) <= 1 at 0.25 and 99.80%. However, in all plans, MatriXX showed significantly lower max (p < 0.05) with an overall mean value of 1.35. In portal dosimetry, compared to gamma values at 100 cm SDD, gamma(max), gamma(avg) and gamma(%) <= 1 values improve from a mean of 0.16, 0.03 and 0.26 at 110 cm SDD to 0.35, 0.05 and 0.29 at 140 cm SDD. PD outcome was independent of gantry rotation. In conclusion, both MatriXX 2D ion chamber array and portal dosimetry showed comparable results and can be use as an alternative to each other for relative photon fluence verification.
引用
收藏
页码:238 / 248
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Dosimetric characterization of a large area pixel-segmented ionization chamber [J].
Amerio, S ;
Boriano, A ;
Bourhaleb, F ;
Cirio, R ;
Donetti, M ;
Fidanzio, A ;
Garelli, E ;
Giordanengo, S ;
Madon, E ;
Marchetto, F ;
Nastasi, U ;
Peroni, C ;
Piermattei, A ;
Freire, CJS ;
Sardo, A ;
Trevisiol, E .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (02) :414-420
[2]   Verification of IMRT fields by film dosimetry [J].
Bucciolini, M ;
Buonamici, FB ;
Casati, M .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (01) :161-168
[3]   Quantitative analysis of patient-specific dosimetric IMRT verification [J].
Budgell, GJ ;
Perrin, BA ;
Mott, JHL ;
Fairfoul, J ;
Mackay, RI .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2005, 50 (01) :103-119
[4]   Retrospective analysis of 2D patient-specific IMRT verifications [J].
Childress, NL ;
White, RA ;
Bloch, C ;
Salehpour, M ;
Dong, L ;
Rosen, II .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2005, 32 (04) :838-850
[5]   A quantitative evaluation of IMRT dose distributions: refinement and clinical assessment of the gamma evaluation [J].
Depuydt, T ;
Van Esch, A ;
Huyskens, DP .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 2002, 62 (03) :309-319
[6]   Dosimetric properties of an amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device for verification of dynamic intensity modulated radiation therapy [J].
Greer, PB ;
Popescu, CC .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2003, 30 (07) :1618-1627
[7]   An investigation of a new amorphous silicon electronic portal imaging device for transit dosimetry [J].
Grein, EE ;
Lee, R ;
Luchka, K .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (10) :2262-2268
[8]   Dosimetric evaluation of a 2D pixel ionization chamber for implementation in clinical routine [J].
Herzen, J. ;
Todorovic, M. ;
Cremers, F. ;
Platz, V. ;
Albers, D. ;
Bartels, A. ;
Schmidt, R. .
PHYSICS IN MEDICINE AND BIOLOGY, 2007, 52 (04) :1197-1208
[9]   Establishing action levels for EPID-based QA for IMRT [J].
Howell, Rebecca M. ;
Smith, Iris P. N. ;
Jarrio, Christie S. .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED CLINICAL MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2008, 9 (03) :16-25
[10]   Film dosimetry for intensity modulated radiation therapy: Dosimetric evaluation [J].
Ju, SG ;
Ahn, YC ;
Huh, SJ ;
Yeo, IJ .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2002, 29 (03) :351-355