Development of an index for concrete bridge deck management in Utah

被引:1
作者
Guthrie, W. Spencer [1 ]
Linford, Ellen T. [2 ]
Eixenberger, David [3 ]
机构
[1] Brigham Young Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Provo, UT 84602 USA
[2] River Consulting, Columbus, OH 43231 USA
[3] Utah Dept Transportat, Salt Lake City, UT 84114 USA
关键词
D O I
10.3141/1991-05
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
The purpose of this research was to develop a new index for concrete bridge deck management in Utah. Data were collected in the summer of 2005 from 15 concrete bridge decks in Salt Lake City. Decks ranged from 2 to 21 years in age and were all constructed with epoxy-coated rebar. Data collected from visual inspection, sounding, Schmidt hammer testing, half-cell potential testing, and chloride concentration testing were analyzed with statistics, and age, cover, and half-cell potential were ultimately selected for inclusion in a new Utah Bridge Deck Index (UBDI), which was structured around a deduct system using a 100-point scale. Coefficients were selected primarily on the basis of the judgment of the researchers and the Utah Department of Transportation (UDOT) personnel involved in the research. Also, threshold values for maintenance, rehabilitation, and replacement (MR&R) options were specified to be the same as those associated with standard sufficiency ratings. The UBDI and corresponding MR&R recommendation were then provided for each of the tested bridge decks. In addition, consideration of the possibility of treatment applications led to required adjustments in the UBDI calculation; the treatment options that were considered include an epoxy seal, a high-performance concrete overlay, and an asphalt membrane overlay. Four case scenarios were developed to demonstrate the response of the revised UBDI equation to these treatments. Finally, as aids for Utah DOT personnel implementing this research, charts were created to facilitate rapid determination of the required number of half-cell potential and cover measurements for different levels of reliability and tolerance.
引用
收藏
页码:35 / 42
页数:8
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
Carter P.D, 1989, CONCR INT, V11, P33
[2]  
Chase S.B., 2000, Dynamics and field testing of bridges
[3]  
GUTHRIE WS, 2006, PUBLICATION UTAH DEP
[4]  
HEARN G, 1996, P STRUCT C 14 BUILD, P245
[5]  
HEMA J, 2005, UT04 BRIGH YOUNG U D
[6]   Analysis of Life-Cycle Maintenance Strategies for Concrete Bridge Decks [J].
Huang, Ying-Hua ;
Adams, Teresa M. ;
Pincheira, Jose A. .
JOURNAL OF BRIDGE ENGINEERING, 2004, 9 (03) :250-258
[7]  
Karlaftis M.G., 1997, P SPEC C INFR COND A, P21
[8]  
Mauch M., 2001, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V7, P49, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2001)7:2(49)
[9]  
MELHEM HG, 2000, J COMPUT CIVIL ENG, V17, P1
[10]  
Mishalani R.G., 2002, J INFRASTRUCT SYST, V8, P139, DOI DOI 10.1061/(ASCE)1076-0342(2002)8:4(139)