Who needs to do what where?: Using learning management systems on residential vs. commuter campuses

被引:47
作者
Lonn, Steven [1 ]
Teasley, Stephanie D. [1 ,2 ]
Krumm, Andrew E. [1 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, USE Lab, Duderstadt Ctr 3350, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Univ Michigan, Sch Informat, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[3] Univ Michigan, Sch Educ, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
关键词
Interactive learning environments; Post-secondary education; Teaching/learning strategies; Improving classroom teaching; Distributed learning environments; PERCEPTIONS;
D O I
10.1016/j.compedu.2010.10.006
中图分类号
TP39 [计算机的应用];
学科分类号
081203 ; 0835 ;
摘要
Learning Management Systems (LMS) are web-based systems allowing instructors and/or students to share materials and interact online. This study compared differences in LMS use between instructors and students at a large residential campus with students at a smaller commuter campus. Responses to an online survey about LMS activities and tools were categorized by three different interaction types: Learner-Instructor (LI), Learner-Content (LC), and Learner-Learner (LL). Aggregated log data was also analyzed to see if students' use was consistent with their beliefs. Respondents from both campuses rate highly all activities and tools within the LMS. Findings suggest that residential students value activities and tools supporting LC interaction more than commuter students, while commuter students value activities and tools fostering LL interactions more than residential students. The aggregated log data was consistent with the survey data showing a higher level of activity in the most heavily used LC-oriented tools for the residential campus and higher activity in the LL-oriented tools for the commuter campus. (c) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:642 / 649
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], THESIS URBANA CHAMPA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2004, EDUCACION SUPERIOR V
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ECAR Study of Undergraduate Students and Information Technology Research Study
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2003, INT REV RES OPEN DIS
[5]  
[Anonymous], P 5 INT C NEW ED ENV
[6]  
[Anonymous], EVALUATING COURSE MA
[7]  
Ansorge CJ, 2003, WEB-BASED LEARNING: WHAT DO WE KNOW? WHERE DO WE GO?, P169
[8]  
Arroway P., 2010, EDUCAUSE CORE DATA S
[9]   A Meta-Analysis of Three Types of Interaction Treatments in Distance Education [J].
Bernard, Robert M. ;
Abrami, Philip C. ;
Borokhovski, Eugene ;
Wade, C. Anne ;
Tamim, Rana M. ;
Surkes, Michael A. ;
Bethel, Edward Clement .
REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH, 2009, 79 (03) :1243-1289
[10]   A longitudinal perspective regarding the use of VLEs by higher education institutions in the United Kingdom [J].
Browne, Tom ;
Jenkins, Martin ;
Walker, Richard .
INTERACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS, 2006, 14 (02) :177-192