Lead-time in the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer

被引:54
作者
Finne, Patrik [1 ]
Fallah, Mandi [1 ,2 ]
Hakama, Matti [1 ,3 ]
Ciatto, Stefano [4 ]
Hugosson, Jonas [5 ]
de Koning, Harry [6 ]
Moss, Sue [7 ]
Nelen, Vera [8 ]
Auvinen, Anssi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tampere, Sch Publ Hlth, FIN-33101 Tampere, Finland
[2] Tampere Univ Hosp, Tampere, Finland
[3] Finnish Canc Registry, FIN-00170 Helsinki, Finland
[4] Ist Studio & Prevenz Oncol, Florence, Italy
[5] Sahlgrens Univ Hosp, Dept Urol, Gothenburg, Sweden
[6] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Publ Hlth, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[7] Inst Canc Res, Surrey, England
[8] Prov Inst Hyg, Dept Publ Hlth, Antwerp, Belgium
关键词
Prostate neoplasms; Mass screening; Prostate-specific antigen; Randomised trials; INCIDENCE TRENDS; ANTIGEN; OVERDIAGNOSIS; PROGRAMS; DISEASE; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejca.2010.09.034
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Lead-time is defined as the time by which screening advances the diagnosis compared with absence of screening. A sufficiently long lead-time needs to be achieved so that cancer can be detected while still curable. A very short lead-time may indicate poor sensitivity of the screening test, while a very long lead-time suggests overdiagnosis. Material and methods: In the first screening round, a total of 56,294 men aged 55-74 years were screened with serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) in five countries of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) with an overall detection rate (prevalence) of 2.8% (1972 prostate cancers). Prostate cancer incidence among 92,142 men randomly allocated to the control arm of the trial was also assessed. Lead-time was estimated as the time required to accumulate a similar cumulative risk of prostate cancer in the control arm to the detection rate in the intervention arm, i.e. from the ratio of detection rate (prevalence of screen-detected cases) and expected incidence (cumulative risk). Results: Using a serum PSA cut-off of 4 ng/ml, the mean lead-time in the whole study population was estimated as 6.8 years (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 7.9-8.4). It was 8 years in The Netherlands, 6 in Sweden and Finland, 5 in Italy and 4 in Belgium. The mean lead-time was similar, 6-7 years, at ages 50-64 years, but close to 8 years among men aged 65-74 years. A lower PSA cut-off level of 3 ng/ml used in Sweden and The Netherlands prolonged the mean lead-time by approximately 1 year. Lead-time based on advanced prostate cancer only was slightly shorter, mean 5.3 years (95% CI 4.6-6.0). The lead-time for the second screening round was slightly shorter than that for the first (5.9, 95% CI 5.4-6.4), reflecting a similar relation between detection rate and control group incidence. Conclusion: The lead-time for prostate cancer found in ERSPC substantially exceeded that found for breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening. One round of prostate cancer screening can advance clinical diagnosis by 4-8 years. Overdiagnosis or detection of non-progressive tumours may contribute substantially to the lead-time. (C) 2010 Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:3102 / 3108
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], INT ENCY PUBLIC HLTH
  • [2] Lead-time in prostate cancer screening (Finland)
    Auvinen, A
    Määttänen, L
    Stenman, UH
    Tammela, T
    Rannikko, S
    Aro, J
    Juusela, H
    Hakama, M
    [J]. CANCER CAUSES & CONTROL, 2002, 13 (03) : 279 - 285
  • [3] Contamination by opportunistic screening in the European Randomized Study of Prostate Cancer Screening
    Ciatto, S
    Zappa, M
    Villers, A
    Paez, A
    Otto, S
    Auvinen, A
    [J]. BJU INTERNATIONAL, 2003, 92 : 97 - 100
  • [4] COLE P, 1980, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V64, P1263
  • [5] Overdiagnosis in early detection programs
    Davidov, O
    Zelen, M
    [J]. BIOSTATISTICS, 2004, 5 (04) : 603 - 613
  • [6] SIMPLIFIED MODELS OF SCREENING FOR CHRONIC DISEASE - ESTIMATION PROCEDURES FROM MASS-SCREENING PROGRAMS
    DAY, NE
    WALTER, SD
    [J]. BIOMETRICS, 1984, 40 (01) : 1 - 14
  • [7] Large-scale randomized prostate cancer screening trials:: Program performances in the European randomized screening for prostate cancer trial and the prostate, lung, colorectal and ovary cancer trial
    de Koning, HJ
    Auvinen, A
    Sanchez, AB
    da Silva, FC
    Ciatto, S
    Denis, L
    Gohagan, JK
    Hakama, M
    Hugosson, J
    Kranse, R
    Nelen, V
    Prorok, PC
    Schröder, FH
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 97 (02) : 237 - 244
  • [8] Lead times and overdetection due to prostate-specific antigen screening:: Estimates from the European randomized study of screening for prostate cancer
    Draisma, G
    Boer, R
    Otto, SJ
    van der Cruijsen, IW
    Damhuis, RAM
    Schröder, FH
    de Koning, HJ
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (12) : 868 - 878
  • [9] Etzioni R, 2002, J NATL CANCER I, V94, P981
  • [10] A PROSPECTIVE EVALUATION OF PLASMA PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN FOR DETECTION OF PROSTATIC-CANCER
    GANN, PH
    HENNEKENS, CH
    STAMPFER, MJ
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1995, 273 (04): : 289 - 294