Addressing community health needs through community engagement research advisory boards

被引：20

作者：

Patten, Christi A. ^{[1
,2
]}

Albertie, Monica L. ^{[3
]}

Chamie, Chara A. ^{[4
]}

Brockman, Tabetha A. ^{[2
]}

Gorfine, Mary ^{[5
]}

Nicholas, Rosa ^{[6
]}

Bock, Martha J. ^{[1
]}

Okamoto, Janet M. ^{[7
]}

Penheiter, Sumedha G. ^{[8
]}

Balls-Berry, Joyce E. ^{[2
]}

机构：

[1] Mayo Clin, Dept Psychiat & Psychol, 200 First St SW,BioBusiness Bldg 5-26, Rochester, MN 55905 USA

[2] Mayo Clin, Community Engagement Program, Ctr Clin & Translat Sci, Rochester, MN 55905 USA

[3] Mayo Clin, Off Hlth Dispar Res, Jacksonville, FL 32224 USA

[4] Mayo Clin, Off Hlth Dispar Res, Scottsdale, AZ USA

[5] Olmsted Cty Youth Commiss, Rochester, MN USA

[6] Clara White Mission, Jacksonville, FL USA

[7] Mayo Clin, Dept Hlth Sci Res, Scottsdale, AZ USA

[8] Mayo Clin, Off Hlth Dispar Res, Rochester, MN USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE | 2019年 / 3卷 / 2-3期

关键词：

Community; research; health; needs assessment; program evaluation;

D O I：

10.1017/cts.2019.366

中图分类号：

R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];

学科分类号：

1001 ;

摘要：

Over 80% of CTSA programs have a community advisory board (CAB). Little is known about how research discussed with CABs aligns with community priorities (bidirectionality). This program evaluation assessed researcher presentations from 2014 to 2018 to the CABs linked to our CTSA at all three sites (Minnesota, Arizona, and Florida) for relevance to local community needs identified in 2013 and/or 2016. From content analysis, of 65 presentations total, 41 (63%) addressed >= 1 local health needs (47% Minnesota, 60% Florida, and 80% Arizona). Cross-cutting topics were cancer/cancer prevention (physical activity/obesity/nutrition) and mental health. Results could help to prioritize health outcomes of community-engaged research efforts.

引用

页码：125 / 128

页数：4

共 18 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 2013, The CTSA program at NIH: Opportunities for advancing clinical and translational research, DOI DOI 10.17226/18323

[2]

[Anonymous], 2011, PRINC COMM ENG

[3] Translating translation [J].

Austin, Christopher P. .

NATURE REVIEWS DRUG DISCOVERY, 2018, 17 (07) :455-456

[4] From appropriate care to evidence-based medicine [J].

Balas, EA .

PEDIATRIC ANNALS, 1998, 27 (09) :581-+

[5] A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES [J].

COHEN, J .

EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) :37-46

[6] Community Advisory Board Members' Perspectives Regarding Opportunities and Challenges of Research Collaboration [J].

Cramer, Mary E. ;

Lazoritz, Stephen ;

Shaffer, Ken ;

Palm, David ;

Ford, Amy L. .

WESTERN JOURNAL OF NURSING RESEARCH, 2018, 40 (07) :1032-1048

[7] Exploring the role of community engagement in improving the health of disadvantaged populations: a systematic review [J].

Cyril, Sheila ;

Smith, Ben J. ;

Possamai-Inesedy, Alphia ;

Renzaho, Andre M. N. .

GLOBAL HEALTH ACTION, 2015, 8 :1-12

[8] Community Advisory Boards Guiding Engaged Research Efforts within a Clinical Translational Sciences Award: Key Contextual Factors Explored [J].

Halladay, Jacqueline R. ;

Donahue, Katrina E. ;

Sleath, Betsy ;

Reuland, Dan ;

Black, Adina ;

Mitchell, C. Madeline ;

Breland, Carol E. ;

Coyne-Beasley, Tamera ;

Mottus, Kathleen ;

Watson, Sable Noelle ;

Lewis, Virginia ;

Wynn, Mysha ;

Corbie-Smith, Giselle .

PROGRESS IN COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERSHIPS-RESEARCH EDUCATION AND ACTION, 2017, 11 (04) :367-377

[9]

Krippendorff K, 2013, CONTENT ANAL INTRO I, DOI [DOI 10.1007/S13398-014-0173-7.2, 10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2]

[10] Evaluation of 3 approaches for increasing patient engagement in clinical research: Feedback from a community engagement advisory board [J].

Matthews, Alicia K. ;

Rak, Kevin ;

Anderson, Emily ;

Castillo, Amparo ;

Ruiz, Raymond ;

Choure, Wendy ;

Willis, Marilyn .

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCE, 2018, 2 (01) :14-19

← 1 2 →