Symptomatic cecal perforation by an intrauterine device with appendectomy removal
被引:10
作者:
Stuckey, A
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Louisiana State Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Orleans, LA 70112 USALouisiana State Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
Stuckey, A
[1
]
Dutreil, P
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Louisiana State Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Orleans, LA 70112 USALouisiana State Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
Dutreil, P
[1
]
Aspuru, E
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Louisiana State Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Orleans, LA 70112 USALouisiana State Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
Aspuru, E
[1
]
Nolan, TE
论文数: 0引用数: 0
h-index: 0
机构:
Louisiana State Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Orleans, LA 70112 USALouisiana State Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
Nolan, TE
[1
]
机构:
[1] Louisiana State Univ, Ctr Hlth Sci, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, New Orleans, LA 70112 USA
BACKGROUND: The intrauterine device is the most used contraceptive in the world, but it is not without risk of perforation of intra-abdominal organs. We report a perforation of the cecum and removal via appendectomy. CASE: A 23-year-old woman developed chronic abdominal pain after insertion of an intrauterine device 8 weeks postpartum. At laparoscopy, the device was found in the cecum and removed via appendectomy. CONCLUSION: Perforation is more common in the immediate postpartum state. An alternate method of removal via appendectomy proved useful. (c) 2005 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.