Towards evidence-based, quality-controlled health promotion: the Dutch recognition system for health promotion interventions

被引:26
作者
Brug, Johannes [1 ]
van Dale, Djoeke [2 ]
Lanting, Loes [2 ]
Kremers, Stef [3 ]
Veenhof, Cindy [4 ]
Leurs, Mariken [2 ]
van Yperen, Tom [5 ]
Kok, Gerjo [6 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam Med Ctr, EMGO Inst Hlth & Care Res, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Natl Inst Publ Hlth & Environm, NL-3721 MA Bilthoven, Netherlands
[3] Maastricht Univ Med Ctr, Dept Hlth Promot, NUTRIM Sch Nutr Toxicol & Metab, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
[4] Netherlands Inst Hlth Serv Res, Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Netherlands Youth Inst, NL-3501 DE Utrecht, Netherlands
[6] Maastricht Univ, Fac Psychol & Neurosci, NL-6200 MD Maastricht, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1093/her/cyq046
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Registration or recognition systems for best-practice health promotion interventions may contribute to better quality assurance and control in health promotion practice. In the Netherlands, such a system has been developed and is being implemented aiming to provide policy makers and professionals with more information on the quality and effectiveness of available health promotion interventions and to promote use of good-practice and evidence-based interventions by health promotion organizations. The quality assessments are supervised by the Netherlands Organization for Public Health and the Environment and the Netherlands Youth Institute and conducted by two committees, one for interventions aimed at youth and one for adults. These committees consist of experts in the fields of research, policy and practice. Four levels of recognition are distinguished inspired by the UK Medical Research Council's evaluation framework for complex interventions to improve health: (i) theoretically sound, (ii) probable effectiveness, (iii) established effectiveness, and (iv) established cost effectiveness. Specific criteria have been set for each level of recognition, except for Level 4 which will be included from 2011. This point of view article describes and discusses the rationale, organization and criteria of this Dutch recognition system and the first experiences with the system.
引用
收藏
页码:1100 / 1106
页数:7
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], METHODS DEV NICE PUB
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Quasi-experimentation: Design analysis issues for field settings
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, GUIDE COMMUNITY PREV
[4]  
Bartholomew K.L., 2006, PLANNING HLTH PROMOT
[5]   Theory, evidence and intervention mapping to improve behavioral nutrition and physical activity interventions [J].
Brug J. ;
Oenema A. ;
Ferreira I. .
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 2 (1)
[6]   Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health [J].
Campbell, M ;
Fitzpatrick, R ;
Haines, A ;
Kinmonth, AL ;
Sandercock, P ;
Spiegelhalter, D ;
Tyrer, P .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2000, 321 (7262) :694-696
[7]   Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance [J].
Craig, Peter ;
Dieppe, Paul ;
Macintyre, Sally ;
Michie, Susan ;
Nazareth, Irwin ;
Petticrew, Mark .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2008, 337 (7676) :979-983
[8]   Public health asks of systems science: To advance our evidence-based practice, can you help us get more practice-based evidence? [J].
Green, LW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2006, 96 (03) :406-409
[9]   Comprehensive quality assessment of healthy school interventions [J].
Leurs, Mariken T. W. ;
Schaalma, Herman P. ;
Jansen, Maria W. J. ;
Mur-Veeman, Ingrid M. ;
van Breukelen, Gerard ;
de Vries, Nanne K. .
PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2007, 45 (05) :366-372
[10]   Evidence-based health promotion [J].
Tilford, S .
HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH, 2000, 15 (06) :659-663