Public services and trade liberalization: Mapping the legal framework

被引:35
作者
Krajewski, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Sch Law, London, England
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jiel/6.2.341
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The impact of the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) on public services is subject to a vivid political debate. From a legal perspective, an important issue is the sectoral scope of the GATS and the exact meaning of the term 'services supplied in the exercise of governmental authority' in Article I:3(b) GATS. This paper shows that this provision is likely to be interpreted narrowly and that most public services will fall within the sectoral scope of GATS. The reason for this finding lies in the definition of governmental services, which emphasizes the non-commercial basis and non-competitive supply of a service. This definition distinguishes GATS law from the similar provision in Article 45 EC. WTO Members wishing to reduce the impact of GATS on public services can do so through their schedules of specific commitments or seek an interpretation of the GATS, which would give them more regulatory flexibility.
引用
收藏
页码:341 / 367
页数:27
相关论文
共 66 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2001, EU WTO LEGAL CONSTIT
[2]  
ANTON A, 2000, NOT SALE DEFENSE PUB, P8
[3]  
Barfield, 2001, FREE TRADE SOVEREIGN
[4]  
BOGNETTI G, 1996, OFFENTLICHE DIENSTLE, P61
[5]   More power to the WTO? [J].
Bronckers, MCEJ .
JOURNAL OF INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC LAW, 2001, 4 (01) :41-65
[6]  
COX H, 1996, OFFENTLICHE DIENSTLE, P22
[7]  
CRAIG PP, 1999, ADM LAW, P133
[8]  
DELAUBADERE A, 1990, TRAITE DROIT ADM
[9]  
*DOM REP, 1994, GATSSC28 DOM REP, P3
[10]  
DUNOFF JL, 2001, TRADE ENV WTO MEAS, P68