Man is not only the subject representing the phenomenal world, but also the human being living with his or her body. Other than the in-person living experience, the former state is just like all kinds of meaning of existence which is understood (verstehen) by man as the "gazing" subject; Different ontologies appear as the products of different points of view, they all manifest a certain degree of reality, yet they are absolutely not the experience itself. In the experience, man cannot see the panorama of life, but only can experience the event occurring in each moment. In this circumstance, the phenomena and the time manifest as the debris-like images emerging endlessly. Thus what is described seems to be just the past and residual impressions as well, and these impressions could not present the overall appearance of Being, but only the phenomeno-logy (phenomeno-logie) or onto-logy (l'onto-logie) which is constituted by some subject's description and understanding of the impressions. And this means of manifestation referring to the Logos has already contained the thought of identity. Therefore the variability of the phenomena and the life has been confined in the mode of totality. Even if though this way to "identify" the changing life has also manifested some possibilities of Being, however, how does the difference be worked out (herausarbeiten) between this possible mode premising the totality (la totality), and the visual image and living experience emerging in the instant? Apart from all kinds of possible mode premising the totality, how does the appearing (paraitre) of so many appearances (tant d'apparences), which suddenly emerge in the experience work out the depth of the phenomena and the life, out of the regulation of the linear time? And furthermore, does this kind of time and image still relate to the concern of Being?
