Assessment of Optimal Condylar Position in the Coronal and Axial Planes with Limited Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

被引:35
作者
Ikeda, Kazumi
Kawamura, Akira [1 ]
Ikeda, Renie [2 ]
机构
[1] Nihon Univ, Dept Orthodont, Sch Dent Matsudo, Chiba, Japan
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Dent, San Francisco, CA USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTICS-IMPLANT ESTHETIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE DENTISTRY | 2011年 / 20卷 / 06期
关键词
CBCT; condylar position; disc displacement; temporomandibular joint; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT DISK; ASYMPTOMATIC VOLUNTEERS; CENTRIC OCCLUSION; DISPLACEMENT; ARTHROGRAPHY; DYSFUNCTION; PREVALENCE; THICKNESS; DIAGNOSIS; ACCURACY;
D O I
10.1111/j.1532-849X.2011.00730.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Purpose: No quantitative standards for the optimal position of the mandibular condyle in the glenoid fossa are yet available in the coronal and axial planes. We previously reported measurements of this position in the sagittal plane, using recently developed limited cone-beam computed tomography (LCBCT) capable of imaging the craniofacial structures with high accuracy. In this study, we assessed the optimal condylar position in the coronal and axial planes. Materials and Methods: The study included 24 joints in 22 asymptomatic patients (10 male, 12 female; age range 12-25 years, mean age 18 years) who had no disc displacement as confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging. Their joints had optimum function with the starting and end points of all functional jaw movements coincident with maximum intercuspation. Joint-space distances between the condyle and glenoid fossa were measured at the medial, central, and lateral positions in the coronal plane, and medial and lateral positions in the axial plane. Results: The mean coronal lateral space (CLS), coronal central space (CCS), and coronal medial space (CMS) were 1.8 +/- 0.4 mm, 2.7 +/- 0.5 mm, and 2.4 +/- 0.5 mm, respectively. The ratio of CLS to CCS to CMS was 1.0 to 1.5 to 1.3. The mean axial medial space (AMS) and axial lateral space (ALS) were 2.1 +/- 0.6 mm and 2.3 +/- 0.6 mm, respectively. There were no significant sex differences in these measurements. Conclusions: These coronal and axial data, along with previously reported sagittal data, might provide norms for 3D assessment of optimal condylar position with LCBCT.
引用
收藏
页码:432 / 438
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   NORMAL TMJ BONY RELATIONSHIPS IN CENTRIC OCCLUSION [J].
BLASCHKE, DD ;
BLASCHKE, TJ .
JOURNAL OF DENTAL RESEARCH, 1981, 60 (02) :98-104
[2]  
CHRISTIANSEN EL, 1987, SCAND J DENT RES, V95, P499
[3]  
Crawford SD, 1999, ANGLE ORTHOD, V69, P103
[4]  
Crowley Caroline, 1996, Journal of Orofacial Pain, V10, P199
[5]   A comparative assessment of mandibular condylar position in patients with anterior disc displacement of the temporomandibular joint [J].
Gateno, J ;
Anderson, PB ;
Xia, JJ ;
Horng, JC ;
Teichgraeber, JF ;
Liebschner, MAK .
JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2004, 62 (01) :39-43
[6]   Disk position and the bilaminar zone of the temporomandibular joint in asymptomatic young individuals by magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Haiter-Neto, F ;
Hollender, L ;
Barclay, P ;
Maravilla, KR .
ORAL SURGERY ORAL MEDICINE ORAL PATHOLOGY ORAL RADIOLOGY AND ENDODONTICS, 2002, 94 (03) :372-378
[7]   THICKNESS OF SOFT-TISSUE LAYERS AND ARTICULAR DISK IN TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT [J].
HANSSON, T ;
OBERG, T ;
CARLSSON, GE ;
KOPP, S .
ACTA ODONTOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1977, 35 (02) :77-83
[8]   TEMPOROMANDIBULAR-JOINT SPATIAL RELATIONSHIPS - OSSEOUS AND SOFT-TISSUES [J].
HATCHER, DC ;
BLOM, RJ ;
BAKER, CG .
JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 1986, 56 (03) :344-353
[9]   Evaluation of the usefulness of the limited cone-beam CT (3DX) in the assessment of the thickness of the roof of the glenoid fossa of the temporomandibular joint [J].
Honda, K ;
Arai, Y ;
Kashima, M ;
Takano, Y ;
Sawada, K ;
Ejima, K ;
Iwai, K .
DENTOMAXILLOFACIAL RADIOLOGY, 2004, 33 (06) :391-395
[10]   Assessment of optimal condylar position with limited cone-beam computed tomography [J].
Ikeda, Kazumi ;
Kawamura, Akira .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ORTHODONTICS AND DENTOFACIAL ORTHOPEDICS, 2009, 135 (04) :495-501