A consensus model for large-scale group decision making with hesitant fuzzy information and changeable clusters

被引:320
作者
Wu, Zhibin [1 ,2 ]
Xu, Jiuping [1 ]
机构
[1] Sichuan Univ, Business Sch, Chengdu 610064, Sichuan, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Ind & Syst Engn, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Large-scale group decision making (LGDM); Hesitant fuzzy element; Possibility distribution; Consensus; Local feedback strategy; LINGUISTIC TERM SETS; CONSISTENCY; ASSESSMENTS; EXPERTS;
D O I
10.1016/j.inffus.2017.09.011
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In the large-scale group decision making (LGDM) consensus process, it is usually assumed that the obtained clusters do not change. However, as the individual preferences change as part of the decision process, this is generally not the case. The aim of this paper, therefore, is to propose a LGDM consensus model in which the clusters are allowed to change and the decision makers provide preferences using fuzzy preference relations. The most commonly used clustering method, k-means, is introduced to identify the subgroups and a possibility distribution based hesitant fuzzy element (PDHFE) is employed to represent each cluster preference. A novel distance measure over the PDHFEs is given to compute the various consensus measures, after which a local feedback strategy with four identification rules and two direction rules is designed to guide the consensus reaching process. The proposed model is distinguished from previous studies where the changes occur on the obtained clusters that the feedback mechanism is directly based on the decision makers in the identified clusters. Further, as the clusters (virtual or nominal) change in every interactive consensus round, the consensus process evolution can be captured. Finally, an emergency decision to choose a rescue plan is illustrated to validate the proposed method and demonstrate distinctive characteristics compared with the existing approaches. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 231
页数:15
相关论文
共 65 条
[1]  
Aggarwal CC, 2014, CH CRC DATA MIN KNOW, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Rational Consensus in Science and Society
[3]  
[Anonymous], FUZZY OPTIM DECIS MA
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, BIOCHEMISTRY-US
[5]  
[Anonymous], OMEGA INT J MANAGE S
[6]   Aggregation functions for typical hesitant fuzzy elements and the action of automorphisms [J].
Bedregal, Benjamin ;
Reiser, Renata ;
Bustince, Humberto ;
Lopez-Molina, Carlos ;
Torra, Vicenc .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2014, 255 :82-99
[7]   Aggregation and consensus for preference relations based on fuzzy partial orders [J].
Beliakov, Gleb ;
James, Simon ;
Wilkin, Tim .
FUZZY OPTIMIZATION AND DECISION MAKING, 2017, 16 (04) :409-428
[8]   A Historical Account of Types of Fuzzy Sets and Their Relationships [J].
Bustince, Humberto ;
Barrenechea, Edurne ;
Pagola, Miguel ;
Fernandez, Javier ;
Xu, Zeshui ;
Bedregal, Benjamin ;
Montero, Javier ;
Hagras, Hani ;
Herrera, Francisco ;
De Baets, Bernard .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON FUZZY SYSTEMS, 2016, 24 (01) :179-194
[9]   Proportional hesitant fuzzy linguistic term set for multiple criteria group decision making [J].
Chen, Zhen-Song ;
Chin, Kwai-Sang ;
Li, Yan-Lai ;
Yang, Yi .
INFORMATION SCIENCES, 2016, 357 :61-87
[10]   Identifying conflict patterns to reach a consensus - A novel group decision approach [J].
Cheng, Li-Chen ;
Chen, Yen-Liang ;
Chiang, Yu-Chia .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2016, 254 (02) :622-631