An Exploration of Environmentally Sustainable Practices Associated with Alternative Grazing Management System Use for Horses, Ponies, Donkeys and Mules in the UK

被引:11
|
作者
Furtado, Tamzin [1 ]
King, Mollie [2 ]
Perkins, Elizabeth [3 ]
McGowan, Catherine [2 ]
Chubbock, Samantha [4 ]
Hannelly, Emmeline [5 ]
Rogers, Jan [6 ]
Pinchbeck, Gina [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Liverpool, Dept Livestock & One Hlth, Inst Infect Vet & Ecol Sci, Liverpool CH64 7TE, Merseyside, England
[2] Univ Liverpool, Inst Infect Vet & Ecol Sci, Sch Vet Sci, Liverpool CH64 7TE, Merseyside, England
[3] Univ Liverpool, Inst Populat Hlth, Liverpool L69 3GL, Merseyside, England
[4] World Horse Welf, Anne Colvin House, Norwich NR16 2LR, Norfolk, England
[5] British Horse Soc, Welf Dept, Abbey Pk, Stareton CV8 2XZ, Warwick, England
[6] Horse Trust, Slad Ln, Princes Risborough HP27 0PP, England
来源
ANIMALS | 2022年 / 12卷 / 02期
关键词
grazing management; equid; equine; horse; environment; sustainability; pasture management; BEHAVIOR; WELFARE;
D O I
10.3390/ani12020151
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Simple Summary Equestrian land could be a potentially important environmental resource, given that pastureland can help to sequester carbon from the atmosphere, prevent soil erosion and provide diverse ecosystems for native plant and wildlife species. However, equestrian land has been overlooked in environmental research and policy. This study reports on the ways which horse, pony, donkey and mule keepers in the UK described environmental practices as part of their equid care. Through an analysis of survey responses (N = 758) from equid keepers using alternative grazing systems, we report on three very different management approaches which resulted in keepers aiming to promote healthy pastures and healthy animals. This study provides the basis for future research exploring attitudes to sustainability in equid keepers, as well as evaluating the impact of their efforts. Equestrian grazing management is a poorly researched area, despite potentially significant environmental impacts. This study explored keepers' use of alternative grazing systems in the care of UK horses, donkeys and mules through an internet survey. The survey was available during the summer of 2020 and comprised closed and open questions, which were analysed with descriptive statistics and iterative thematic analysis, respectively. A total of 758 responses was incorporated into the analysis; the most popular system used were tracks (56.5%), Equicentral (19%), "other" (e.g., non-grass turnout) (12.5%), rewilding (7.5%) and turnout on either moorland (0.7%) or woodland (2.5%). The thematic analysis highlighted that equid keepers across the systems were highly engaged in exploring sustainable practices. Their approaches varied according to each system, yet all aimed to fulfil practices in three major categories, i.e., supporting diverse plant life (usually through restricting equid access to certain areas), supporting wildlife (through the creation of biodiverse environments) and sustainably managing droppings and helminths. Additionally, proponents of the Equicentral systems declared to be aiming to support soil health. These data provide a promising insight into equid keepers' behaviour and attitudes to sustainability.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
empty
未找到相关数据