Motor speech impairment predicts expressive language in minimally verbal, but not low verbal, individuals with autism spectrum disorder

被引:40
作者
Chenausky, Karen [1 ]
Brignell, Amanda [2 ,3 ]
Morgan, Angela [2 ,3 ]
Tager-Flusberg, Helen [1 ]
机构
[1] Boston Univ, Sargent Coll, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Murdoch Childrens Res Inst, Speech & Language, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
[3] Univ Melbourne, Melbourne, Vic, Australia
关键词
Autism spectrum disorder; speech; expressive language; motor speech disorder; childhood apraxia of speech; YOUNG-CHILDREN; RISK-FACTORS; CHILDHOOD APRAXIA; COMMUNICATION; BEHAVIORS;
D O I
10.1177/2396941519856333
中图分类号
G76 [特殊教育];
学科分类号
040109 ;
摘要
Background and aims: Developmental motor speech impairment has been suspected, but rarely systematically examined, in low- and minimally verbal individuals with autism spectrum disorder. We aimed to investigate the extent of motor speech impairment in this population and its relation to number of different words produced during a semi-structured language sample. Methods: Videos of 54 low-verbal and minimally verbal individuals (ages 4;4-18;10) performing portions of a speech praxis test were coded for signs of motor speech impairment (e.g., childhood apraxia of speech). Age, autism spectrum disorder severity, nonspeech oral-motor ability, speech production ability, nonverbal IQ, and receptive vocabulary were compared between groups. Results: Four groups emerged: (1) speech within normal limits (n = 12), (2) non-childhood apraxia of speech impairment (n = 16), (3) suspected childhood apraxia of speech (n = 13), and (4) insufficient speech to rate (n = 13). Groups differed significantly in nonspeech oral-motor ability, speech production ability, nonverbal IQ, and receptive vocabulary. Overall, only speech production ability and receptive vocabulary accounted for significant variance in number of different words. Receptive vocabulary significantly predicted number of different words only in Groups 1 and 2, while speech production ability significantly predicted number of different words only in Groups 3 and 4. Conclusions and implications: If replicated, our findings have important implications for developing much-needed spoken language interventions in minimally verbal individuals with autism spectrum disorder.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 12
页数:12
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]  
Adams L., 1998, Focus on Autism and Other Developmental Disabilities, V13, P108, DOI DOI 10.1177/108835769801300207
[2]  
American Speech Language Hearing Association A.S.H.A., 2004, GUID AUD ASS CHILDR
[3]  
American Speech-Language-Hearing Association (ASHA), 1993, DEF COMM DIS VAR
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2013, LEITER 3 LEITER INT
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Verbal Motor Production Assessment for Children-Revised (VMPAC)
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2007, CHILDH APR SPEECH
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2011, INT M AUT RES SAN DI
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Speech sound disorders in children
[9]  
[Anonymous], Speech sound disorders: Articulation and phonology
[10]  
Archana G., 2008, MANUAL COMMUNICAID A