Intermittent epidural bolus versus continuous epidural infusions for labor analgesia: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

被引:16
|
作者
Liu, Xian [1 ]
Zhang, Huan [1 ]
Zhang, Haijing [1 ]
Guo, Mengzhuo [1 ]
Gao, Yuanchao [1 ]
Du, Chunyan [1 ]
机构
[1] Tsinghua Univ, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hosp, Sch Clin Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Beijing, Peoples R China
来源
PLOS ONE | 2020年 / 15卷 / 06期
关键词
AUTOMATED MANDATORY BOLUSES; NEONATAL OUTCOMES; CESAREAN DELIVERY; BASAL INFUSION; DOUBLE-BLIND; FENTANYL;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0234353
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
There are inconsistent results regarding the efficacy and safety of intermittent epidural bolus (IPB) versus continuous epidural infusions (CPI) for labor analgesia. This study used a meta-analytic approach to assess the safety and treatment efficacy of IPB versus CPI for labor analgesia based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Four electronic databases were used to identify eligible RCTs. Pooled effect estimates at 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Twenty-two RCTs with 2,573 parturients were selected for final analysis. The findings revealed no significant differences between IPB and CPI for the incidences of cesarean and instrumental delivery. IPB was shown to be associated with shorter total duration of labor [weighted mean difference (WMD): -21.46; 95% CI: -25.07 to -17.85; P < 0.001], duration of the first of stage of labor (WMD: -13.41; 95% CI: -21.01 to -5.81; P = 0.001), and duration of the second stage of labor (WMD: -4.98; 95% CI: -9.32 to -0.63; P = 0.025). Furthermore, IPB significantly reduced the incidences of required anesthetic interventions compared with CPI [relative risk (RR): 0.61; 95% CI: 0.39-0.95; P = 0.030], whereas there was no significant difference between IPB and CPI for the time required in the first anesthetic intervention (WMD: 7.73; 95% CI: -33.68-49.15; P = 0.714). The local anesthetic IPB (bupivacaine equivalents) was associated with lower milligrams per hour of local anesthetic (WMD: -0.89; 95% CI: -1.41 to -0.36; P = 0.001) and better maternal satisfaction (WMD: 8.76; 95% CI: 4.18-13.35; P < 0.001). There were no significant differences between IPB and CPI for the risk of adverse events. This study found that parturients with IPB have short total duration of labor and duration of the first and second stage of labor, reduced requirements for additional anesthetic interventions, and improved maternal satisfaction.
引用
收藏
页数:17
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intermittent Epidural Bolus Compared with Continuous Epidural Infusions for Labor Analgesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    George, Ronald B.
    Allen, Terrence K.
    Habib, Ashraf S.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2013, 116 (01): : 133 - 144
  • [2] The effect of programmed intermittent epidural bolus compared with continuous epidural infusion in labor analgesia with ropivacaine: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Huang, Rui
    Zhu, Jiang
    Zhao, Zizuo
    Wang, Bin
    ANNALS OF PALLIATIVE MEDICINE, 2021, 10 (03) : 2408 - +
  • [3] Intermittent Epidural Bolus Compared with Continuous Epidural Infusions for Labor Analgesia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (vol 116, pg 133, 2013)
    George, R. B.
    Allen, T. K.
    Habib, A. S.
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2013, 116 (06): : 1385 - 1385
  • [4] A randomized comparison of programmed intermittent epidural bolus with continuous epidural infusion for labor analgesia
    Wong, CA
    Ratliff, JT
    Sullivan, JT
    Scavone, BM
    Toledo, P
    McCarthv, RT
    ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 2006, 102 (03): : 904 - 909
  • [5] Programmed intermittent epidural bolus in parturients A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Wang, Xian-xue
    Zhang, Xiao-lan
    Zhang, Zhao-xia
    Xin, Zi-qin
    Guo, Hua-jing
    Liu, Hai-yan
    Xiao, Jing
    Zhang, Yun-lin
    Yuan, Shu-zhen
    MEDICINE, 2022, 101 (05) : E28742
  • [6] A Meta-Analysis of Comparing Intermittent Epidural Boluses and Continuous Epidural Infusion for Labor Analgesia
    Tzeng, I-Shiang
    Kao, Ming-Chang
    Pan, Po-Ting
    Chen, Chu-Ting
    Lin, Han-Yu
    Hsieh, Po-Chun
    Kuo, Chan-Yen
    Hsieh, Tsung-Han
    Kung, Woon-Man
    Cheng, Chu-Hsuan
    Chen, Kuo-Hu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH, 2020, 17 (19) : 1 - 16
  • [7] A prospective, randomized, blinded-endpoint, controlled study - continuous epidural infusion versus programmed intermittent epidural bolus in labor analgesia
    Nunes, Joana
    Nunes, Sara
    Veiga, Mariano
    Cortez, Mara
    Seifert, Isabel
    REVISTA BRASILEIRA DE ANESTESIOLOGIA, 2016, 66 (05): : 439 - 444
  • [8] Comparison of intermittent epidural bolus, continuous epidural infusion and patient controlled-epidural analgesia during labor
    Boutros, A
    Blary, S
    Bronchard, R
    Bonnet, F
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA, 1999, 8 (04) : 236 - 241
  • [9] The effect of patient continuous epidural analgesia versus intermittent bolus epidural analgesia on progress of labor and patient satisfaction
    Salim, R
    Lavee, M
    Moskoviz, A
    Nachum, Z
    Shalev, E
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2003, 189 (06) : S134 - S134
  • [10] Comparison of continuous epidural infusion and programmed intermittent epidural bolus in labor analgesia
    Lin, Yunan
    Li, Qiang
    Liu, Jinlu
    Yang, Ruimin
    Liu, Jingchen
    THERAPEUTICS AND CLINICAL RISK MANAGEMENT, 2016, 12 : 1107 - 1112