The institutional capacity of the Health Sector and the response to COVID-19 in a global perspective

被引:4
作者
Costa, Nilson do Rosario [1 ]
Fagundes da Silva, Paulo Roberto [1 ]
do Lago, Marcos Junqueira [2 ]
Jatoba, Alessandro [3 ]
机构
[1] Fundacao Oswaldo Cruz Fiocruz, Escola Nacl Saude Publ Sergio Arouca, Dept Ciencias Sociais, R Leopoldo Bulhoes 1480,Sala 913, BR-21041210 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[2] Univ Estado Rio De Janeiro, Fac Ciencias Med, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
[3] Fiocruz MS, Ctr Estudos Estrateg, Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
来源
CIENCIA & SAUDE COLETIVA | 2021年 / 26卷 / 10期
关键词
Global Health Security Index; COVID-19; Pandemic; Institutional capacity; Comparative analysis;
D O I
10.1590/1413-812320212610.11852021
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
This study approaches the Global Health Security Index (GHSI) according to the responses to the first cycle of the COVID-19. The GHSI ranks countries' institutional capacity to address biological risks. We analyzed data regarding the spread of COVID-19 pandemic in 50 countries to assess the ability of GHSI to anticipate health risks. The lack of vaccination determined the spread of the COVID-19 in the first cycle of the pandemic in 2020. Country indicators are correlated and demonstrated by descriptive statistics. The clustering method groups countries by similar age composition. The main restriction that can be attributed to the GHSI concerns the preference of biomedical variables for measuring institutional capacity. Our work shows that the pandemic had a significant impact on better-prepared countries, according to the GHSI, to control the spread of diseases and offer more access to health care in 2020. This paper points out that the health sector depended on the cooperation of governments in the adoption of social distancing during the first cycle of the pandemic. The GHSI failed to consider the role of political leaders who challenge severe health risks by vetoing social distancing.
引用
收藏
页码:4645 / 4654
页数:10
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] The Global Health Security Index is not predictive of coronavirus pandemic responses among Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries
    Abbey, Enoch J.
    Khalifa, Banda A. A.
    Oduwole, Modupe O.
    Ayeh, Samuel K.
    Nudotor, Richard D.
    Salia, Emmanuella L.
    Lasisi, Oluwatobi
    Bennett, Seth
    Yusuf, Hasiya E.
    Agwu, Allison L.
    Karakousis, Petros C.
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2020, 15 (10):
  • [2] Agren D., 2020, GUARDIAN
  • [3] Agresti Alan., 1997, Statistical Methods for the Social Sciences, V3rd
  • [4] Ainslie Kylie E C, 2020, Wellcome Open Res, V5, P81, DOI 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15843.2
  • [5] COVID-19 in Brazil: "So what?"
    不详
    [J]. LANCET, 2020, 395 (10235) : 1461 - 1461
  • [6] [Anonymous], 2020, The Economist
  • [7] [Anonymous], 1980, MED HIST, DOI DOI 10.1515/9781400854622
  • [8] [Anonymous], GLOB HLTH OBS IND VI
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2020, The Guardian
  • [10] Validation analysis of Global Health Security Index (GHSI) scores 2019
    Boyd, Matthew J.
    Wilson, Nick
    Nelson, Cassidy
    [J]. BMJ GLOBAL HEALTH, 2020, 5 (10):