Alliances as system builders: On the conditions of network formation and system building in sustainability transitions

被引:12
作者
Tziva, M. [1 ]
Negro, S. O. [1 ]
Kalfagianni, A. [1 ]
Hekkert, M. P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Utrecht, Copernicus Inst Sustainable Dev, Princetonlaan 8a, NL-3484 CB Utrecht, Netherlands
关键词
Sustainability transitions; System building; Regulatory intermediaries; Alliances; Technological innovation system; Protein transition; TECHNOLOGICAL-INNOVATION SYSTEMS; CROSS-SECTOR ALLIANCES; PERSPECTIVE; FRAMEWORK; ROLES; GOVERNMENT; GOVERNANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.128616
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The technological innovation systems (TIS) literature and the strand of system building studies explain the role of networks in the strategic creation of favorable institutional conditions for sustainability transitions. To better understand collective system building, it is important to delve into the formation of networks composed of diverse organizations, including firms, as well as government and civil society organizations, such as alliances. In this paper, we propose an analytical framework for the study of factors that influence the formation of alliances, as well as the contribution of alliances to system building. To illustrate our analytical framework empirically, we conduct a case study of the Green Protein Alliance (GPA), a distinctive example of an alliance network aiming to promote the transition to plant-based diets in the Netherlands. The results highlight the importance of organi-zational motives, organizational resources, and relationships for the formation of alliances. These factors also influence the type and course of system building strategies, as well as the creation of system-level resources. Moreover, we argue that alliances between diverse types of organizations can provide opportunities to accelerate transitions by promoting the adoption of potentially beneficial innovations and sustainable consumption.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 75 条
  • [1] Theorizing Regulatory Intermediaries: The RIT Model
    Abbott, Kenneth W.
    Levi-faur, David
    Snidal, Duncan
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2017, 670 (01) : 14 - 35
  • [2] Introducing Regulatory Intermediaries
    Abbott, Kenneth W.
    Levi-Faur, David
    Snidal, Duncan
    [J]. ANNALS OF THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF POLITICAL AND SOCIAL SCIENCE, 2017, 670 (01) : 6 - 13
  • [3] The next protein transition
    Aiking, Harry
    de Boer, Joop
    [J]. TRENDS IN FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 105 (105) : 515 - 522
  • [4] Andrade AD, 2009, QUAL REP, V14, P42
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2015, RICHTL GOED VOED 201
  • [6] [Anonymous], PUBLIC POLICY ADM
  • [7] [Anonymous], 2011, RICHTL GOED VOED EC
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1994, J. Clean. Prod, DOI DOI 10.1016/0959-6526(94)90035-3
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2017, OJ BEET BELG HAND
  • [10] [Anonymous], 2015, VOEDS VEIL GEZ DUURZ