Integration of biological, economic, and sociological knowledge by Bayesian belief networks: the interdisciplinary evaluation of potential management plans for Baltic salmon

被引:41
作者
Levontin, Polina [1 ]
Kulmala, Soile [2 ]
Haapasaari, Paivi [3 ]
Kuikka, Sakari [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ London Imperial Coll Sci Technol & Med, Ctr Environm Policy, Ascot SL5 7PY, Berks, England
[2] Finnish Environm Inst SYKE, Helsinki 00250, Finland
[3] Univ Helsinki, Dept Environm Sci, Fisheries & Environm Management Grp FEM, FIN-00014 Helsinki, Finland
关键词
bioeconomic modelling; commitment and implementation uncertainty; expert knowledge; fisheries management; LAND MANAGEMENT; MODEL; FISHERIES; EXPLOITATION; RIVERS;
D O I
10.1093/icesjms/fsr004
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
There is a growing need to evaluate fisheries management plans in a comprehensive interdisciplinary context involving stakeholders. The use of a probabilistic management model to evaluate potential management plans for Baltic salmon fisheries is demonstrated. The analysis draws on several scientific studies: a biological stock assessment with integrated economic analysis of the commercial fisheries, an evaluation of recreational fisheries, and a sociological study aimed at understanding stakeholder perspectives and potential commitment to alternative management plans. A Bayesian belief network is used to synthesize the findings from these separate studies and to evaluate the robustness of management decisions to different priorities and various sources of uncertainty. In particular, the importance of sociological studies in quantifying uncertainty about the commitment of fishers to management plans is highlighted by modelling the link between commitment and implementation success. Such analyses, relying on prior knowledge, can forewarn of the consequences of management choices before they are implemented.
引用
收藏
页码:632 / 638
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2002, Official Journal of the European Union, V358, P59
[2]  
[Anonymous], GEFITINIB INTERVIEW
[3]   Bayesian belief networks as a meta-modelling tool in integrated river basin management - Pros and cons in evaluating nutrient abatement decisions under uncertainty in a Norwegian river basin [J].
Barton, D. N. ;
Saloranta, T. ;
Moe, S. J. ;
Eggestad, H. O. ;
Kuikka, S. .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2008, 66 (01) :91-104
[4]   Assessing the decline of brown trout (Salmo trutta) in Swiss rivers using a Bayesian probability network [J].
Borsuk, ME ;
Reichert, P ;
Peter, A ;
Schager, E ;
Burkhardt-Holm, P .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2006, 192 (1-2) :224-244
[5]   The use of Hugin® to develop Bayesian networks as an aid to integrated water resource planning [J].
Bromley, J ;
Jackson, NA ;
Clymer, OJ ;
Giacomello, AM ;
Jensen, FV .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2005, 20 (02) :231-242
[6]  
Burgman M., 2005, RISK DECISIONS CONSE
[7]   Bayesian Networks and participatory modelling in water resource management [J].
Castelletti, A. ;
Soncini-Sessa, R. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2007, 22 (08) :1075-1088
[8]  
*CEC, 2003, OFFICIAL J EUROPEA C, V47, P5
[9]  
CEC, 2009, COM 2009, 163 final
[10]   SOCIAL CAPITAL IN THE CREATION OF HUMAN-CAPITAL [J].
COLEMAN, JS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY, 1988, 94 :S95-S120