Determinants of Family Consent to Tissue Donation

被引:44
作者
Siminoff, Laura A. [1 ]
Traino, Heather M. [1 ]
Gordon, Nahida [2 ]
机构
[1] Virginia Commonwealth Univ, Dept Social & Behav Hlth, Richmond, VA 23220 USA
[2] Case Western Reserve Univ, Sch Nursing, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE | 2010年 / 69卷 / 04期
基金
美国医疗保健研究与质量局;
关键词
Tissue donation; Family consent; Medical decision-making; ORGAN DONATION; CORNEA DONATION; DECISION; TELEPHONE; DONOR;
D O I
10.1097/TA.0b013e3181d8924b
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Background: Family consent to tissue donation currently falls well below that for solid organ donation. Moreover, research suggests that Americans have limited understanding of tissue donation, an activity largely overshadowed by the more publicly visible organ donation. This research sought to identify determinants of families' consent to tissue donation. Methods: Data collection included a brief, self-administered survey completed by tissue bank staff and telephone interviews with family for a sample of tissue donor-eligible deaths reported to a national sample of 16 United States Tissue banks from 2003 to 2006. Family members (N = 1,418) and tissue bank staff (n = 226) involved in the tissue donation decision participated in the research. Results: The families of 1,015 (71.6%) tissue donor-eligible patients consented to tissue donation; 403 (26.8%) families refused. Results revealed a multitude of associations between study variables and the donation decision. A subsequent multivariable analysis identified determinants of family consent to tissue donation, including the discussion of key donation-related issues during the request (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 17.22; 95% confidence interval [CI], 11.61-25.54), the quality of communication during the request (AOR, 12.39; CI, 7.76-20.02), families' tissue donation attitudes and knowledge (AOR, 10.01; CI, 6.47-15.50), families' initial reactions to the request (AOR, 7.86; CI, 5.13-12.05), families' advance notice of the request (AOR, 3.95; CI, 2.41-6.46), and patient and family sociodemographic characteristics (AOR, 3.32; CI, 2.01-5.48). Conclusions: Family consent to tissue donation is affected by many of the same variables influencing consent to solid organ donation. Recommendations for practice are provided.
引用
收藏
页码:956 / 963
页数:8
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], US CENS 2000
[2]  
Beard Jane, 2002, Prog Transplant, V12, P42
[3]  
BERLO DK, 1994, COMMUNICATION RES ME
[4]   Validation of a decision regret scale [J].
Brehaut, JC ;
O'Connor, AM ;
Wood, TJ ;
Hack, TF ;
Siminoff, L ;
Gordon, E ;
Feldman-Stewart, D .
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING, 2003, 23 (04) :281-292
[5]   RELATIONAL COMMUNICATION, SATISFACTION, COMPLIANCE-GAINING STRATEGIES, AND COMPLIANCE IN COMMUNICATION BETWEEN PHYSICIANS AND PATIENTS [J].
BURGOON, JK ;
PFAU, M ;
PARROTT, R ;
BIRK, T ;
COKER, R ;
BURGOON, M .
COMMUNICATION MONOGRAPHS, 1987, 54 (03) :307-324
[6]  
DeJong W, 1998, Am J Crit Care, V7, P13
[7]   Organ donation:: A comparison of donating and nondonating families [J].
Frutos, MA ;
Blanca, MJ ;
Mansilla, JJ ;
Rando, B ;
Ruiz, P ;
Guerrero, F ;
López, G ;
Ortuño, C .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2005, 37 (03) :1557-1559
[8]   Obtaining cornea donation consent by telephone [J].
Gain, P ;
Thuret, G ;
Pugniet, JL ;
Rizzi, P ;
Acquart, S ;
Le Petit, JC ;
Maugery, J .
TRANSPLANTATION, 2002, 73 (06) :926-929
[9]  
GARRISON RN, 1991, SURG GYNECOL OBSTET, V173, P391
[10]   Rates of potential and actual cornea donation in a general hospital: Impact of exhaustive death screening and surrogate phone consent [J].
Geissler, A ;
Paoli, K ;
Maitrejean, C ;
Durand-Gasselin, J .
TRANSPLANTATION PROCEEDINGS, 2004, 36 (10) :2894-2895