Impact of the Share 35 Policy on Perioperative Management and Mortality in Liver Transplantation Recipients

被引:0
|
作者
Lapisatepun, Warangkana [1 ]
Agopian, Vatche G. [2 ]
Xia, Victor W. [1 ]
Lapisatepun, Worakitti [2 ]
机构
[1] Ronald Reagan Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Anesthesiol, Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA USA
[2] Ronald Reagan Univ Calif Los Angeles, David Geffen Sch Med, Dept Surg, Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
关键词
Liver Transplantation; Perioperative Care; Tissue and Organ Procurement; VENOVENOUS BYPASS; SELECTIVE USE; MODEL; PRETRANSPLANT; TRANSFUSION; ACTIVATION; OUTCOMES; SURGERY;
D O I
10.12659/AOT.932895
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The Share 35 policy was introduced in 2013 by the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) to increase opportunities of sicker patients to access liver transplantation. However, it has the disadvantage of higher MELD score associated with adverse postoperative transplant outcomes. Early data after implemen-tation of the Share 35 policy showed significantly poorer post-transplantation survival in some UNOS regions. We aimed to analyze the impact of Share 35 on demographics of patients, perioperative management, and perioperative mortality. Material/Methods: A retrospective analysis of data was performed from an institutional liver transplantation cohort from 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2017. Adult patients who underwent liver transplantation before 2013 were defined as the pre-Share 35 group and the other group was defined as the post-Share 35 group. The MELD score of each patient was calculated at the time of transplantation. Perioperative mortality was defined as death within 30 days after the operation. Results: A total of 1596 patients underwent liver transplantation. Of those, 895 recipients underwent OLT in the pre-Share 35 era and 737 in the post-Share 35 era. The median MELD score was significantly higher in the post-Share 35 group (30 vs 26, P<0.001) and 45.7% of the post-Share 35 group had MELD scores >_35. In intraoperative man-agement, patients required significantly more blood component transfusion, intraoperative vasopressor, and fluid replacement. Veno-venous bypass (VVB) usage was significantly higher in the post-Share 35 era (47.2% vs 38.1%, P<0.001). In the subgroup of patients with MELD scores >_35, the median waiting time was signifi-cantly shorter (18.5 vs 14.5 days, P=0.045). Overall perioperative mortality was not significantly difference be-tween groups (P=0.435). Conclusions: After implementation of the Share 35 policy, we performed liver transplantation in significantly higher medical acuity patients, which required more medical resources to obtain a result comparable to that of the pre-Share 35 era.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Perioperative mortality in liver transplantation before and after the implementation of the organ allocation policy Share 35
    Holm, Zacharias D.
    Kolodzie, Kerstin
    Galli, Alessandro M.
    Meyhoff, Christian S.
    Niemann, Claus U.
    Adelmann, Dieter
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2023, 37 (01)
  • [2] Liver Transplantation After Share 35: Impact on Pretransplant and Posttransplant Costs and Mortality
    Nicolas, Clara T.
    Nyberg, Scott L.
    Heimbach, Julie K.
    Watt, Kymberly
    Chen, Harvey S.
    Hathcock, Matthew A.
    Kremers, Walter K.
    LIVER TRANSPLANTATION, 2017, 23 (01) : 11 - 18
  • [3] Improved posttransplant mortality after share 35 for liver transplantation
    Kwong, Allison J.
    Goel, Aparna
    Mannalithara, Ajitha
    Kim, W. Ray
    HEPATOLOGY, 2018, 67 (01) : 273 - 281
  • [4] Liver Transplantation after Share 35: Impact on Pre- and Post-Transplant Costs and Mortality
    Nicolas, Clara T.
    Nyberg, Scott L.
    Heimbach, Julie
    Chen, Harvey S.
    Hathcock, Matthew
    Kremers, Walter K.
    HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 64 : 693A - 694A
  • [5] Impact of Share 35 liver transplantation allocation in Australia and New Zealand
    Fink, Michael A.
    Gow, Paul J.
    Mccaughan, Geoffrey W.
    Hodgkinson, Peter
    Chen, John
    Mccall, John
    Jaques, Bryon
    Crawford, Michael
    Strasser, Simone I.
    Hardikar, Winita
    Brooke-Smith, Mark
    Starkey, Graham
    Jeffrey, Gary P.
    Gane, Ed
    Stormon, Michael
    Evans, Helen
    Tallis, Caroline
    Byrne, Amanda J.
    Jones, Robert M.
    CLINICAL TRANSPLANTATION, 2024, 38 (01)
  • [6] Implementation of Share 35 Policy has Improved Survival following Liver Transplantation
    Cholankeril, George
    Li, Andrew A.
    Nair, Satheesh
    Ahmed, Aijaz
    HEPATOLOGY, 2017, 66 : 883A - 883A
  • [7] Effects of Share 35 Policy on Liver Transplantation Outcomes for Patients With Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis
    Zhang, Yefei
    Boktour, Maha R.
    PROGRESS IN TRANSPLANTATION, 2019, 29 (03) : 248 - 253
  • [8] Assessing the Impact of the Share35 Liver Allocation Policy: Survival Outcomes Among Liver Re-Transplant Recipients.
    Ortiz, J.
    Koizumi, N.
    Kwon, C.
    Zhang, Y.
    Ortiz, C.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2016, 16 : 245 - 245
  • [9] EFFECTS OF INTRAOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT ON PERIOPERATIVE MORTALITY OF LIVER-TRANSPLANT RECIPIENTS
    BELANI, KG
    ESTRIN, JA
    ASCHER, N
    KUNASIEWICZ, J
    KARNAVAS, A
    NAJARIAN, JS
    BUCKLEY, JJ
    ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1986, 65 (3A) : A93 - A93
  • [10] The Impact of the Share 35 Policy on First Allograft Outcomes Among Kidney Transplant Recipients
    Gupta, Meera
    Wood, Alexander
    Abt, Peter
    Levine, Matthew
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TRANSPLANTATION, 2014, 14 : 75 - 75