Edge-Of-Field Evaluation of the Ohio Phosphorus Risk Index

被引:22
作者
Williams, Mark R. [1 ]
King, Kevin W. [2 ]
LaBarge, Gregory A. [3 ]
Confesor, Remegio B., Jr. [4 ]
Fausey, Norman R. [2 ]
机构
[1] USDA ARS, Natl Soil Eros Res Lab, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Soil Drainage Res Unit, Columbus, OH USA
[3] Ohio State Univ, Marion, OH USA
[4] Heidelberg Univ, Natl Ctr Water Qual Res, Tiffin, OH USA
关键词
TILE-DRAINED LANDSCAPES; SENSITIVITY-ANALYSIS; SITE VULNERABILITY; ASSESSMENT-TOOL; WATER-QUALITY; RUNOFF; MANAGEMENT; LOSSES; SCALE; LOADS;
D O I
10.2134/jeq2016.05.0198
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The Phosphorus Index (PI) has been the cornerstone for phosphorus (P)-based management and planning over the past twenty years, yet field-scale evaluation of many state PIs has been limited. In this study, P loads measured in surface runoff and tile discharge from 40 agricultural fields in Ohio with prevailing management practices were used to evaluate the Ohio PI. Annual P loads were highly variable among fields (dissolved reactive P: 0.03-4.51 kg ha(-1), total P: 0.03-6.88 kg ha(-1)). Both measured annual dissolved reactive P (R-2 = 0.36, p < 0.001) and total P (R-2 = 0.25, p < 0.001) loads were significantly related to Ohio PI score. The relationship between measured load and PI score substantially improved when averaged annual field values were used (dissolved reactive P: R-2 = 0.71, total P: R-2 = 0.73), indicating that the Ohio PI should be utilized to evaluate average annual risk of P loss, rather than as an annual risk tool. Comparison between the Ohio PI and other established local and national metrics resulted in large differences in potential P management recommendations for the monitored fields. In the near term, revision of Ohio PI risk categories and management recommendations using local P loading thresholds is needed. To meet the minimum criteria for state PI tools, future research efforts should focus on using measured field data (i) to incorporate new input factors (i.e., P application timing and leaching potential) into the Ohio PI, and (ii) to calibrate and validate the Ohio PI to provide better P risk assessments and management recommendations.
引用
收藏
页码:1306 / 1313
页数:8
相关论文
共 38 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 600479020 USEPA ENV
[2]   Development and testing of a new phosphorus index for Kentucky [J].
Bolster, C. H. ;
Horvath, T. ;
Lee, B. D. ;
Mehilhope, S. ;
Higgins, S. ;
Delgado, J. A. .
JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2014, 69 (03) :183-196
[3]   Using a Phosphorus Loss Model to Evaluate and Improve Phosphorus Indices [J].
Bolster, Carl H. ;
Vadas, Peter A. ;
Sharpley, Andrew N. ;
Lory, John A. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2012, 41 (06) :1758-1766
[4]   Assessment of the Georgia Phosphorus Index on farm at the field scale for grassland management [J].
Butler, D. M. ;
Franklin, D. H. ;
Cabrera, M. L. ;
Risse, L. M. ;
Radcliffe, D. E. ;
West, L. T. ;
Gaskin, J. W. .
JOURNAL OF SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION, 2010, 65 (03) :200-210
[5]  
Conover C., 2013, SO COOPERATIVE SERIE, V417
[6]   Development of a phosphorus index for pastures fertilized with poultry litter - Factors affecting phosphorus runoff [J].
DeLaune, PB ;
Moore, PA ;
Carman, DK ;
Sharpley, AN ;
Haggard, BE ;
Daniel, TC .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2004, 33 (06) :2183-2191
[7]  
Eghball B, 2001, J SOIL WATER CONSERV, V56, P202
[8]  
Fausey N. R., 2016, J GREAT LAK IN PRESS
[9]   Sensitivity Analysis of the Agricultural Policy/Environmental eXtender (APEX) for Phosphorus Loads in Tile-Drained Landscapes [J].
Ford, W. ;
King, K. ;
Williams, M. ;
Williams, J. ;
Fausey, N. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2015, 44 (04) :1099-1110
[10]   Phosphorus management at the watershed scale: a modification of the phosphorus index [J].
Gburek, WJ ;
Sharpley, AN ;
Heathwaite, L ;
Folmar, GJ .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY, 2000, 29 (01) :130-144